Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 4 authors, 2022-09-27

Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] Kill the time spent in patch_instruction()

From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2022-05-17 12:37:50
Also in: lkml

Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] writes:
Le 15/05/2022 à 12:28, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
quoted
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:40:17 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
quoted
This series reduces by 70% the time required to activate
ftrace on an 8xx with CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX.

Measure is performed in function ftrace_replace_code() using mftb()
around the loop.

With the series,
- Without CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX, 416000 TB ticks are measured.
- With CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX, 546000 TB ticks are measured.

[...]
Patches 1, 3 and 4 applied to powerpc/next.

[1/4] powerpc/code-patching: Don't call is_vmalloc_or_module_addr() without CONFIG_MODULES
       https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/cb3ac45214c03852430979a43180371a44b74596
[3/4] powerpc/code-patching: Use jump_label for testing freed initmem
       https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/b033767848c4115e486b1a51946de3bee2ac0fa6
[4/4] powerpc/code-patching: Use jump_label to check if poking_init() is done
       https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/1751289268ef959db68b0b6f798d904d6403309a
Patch 2 was the keystone of this series. What happened to it ?
It broke on 64-bit. I think I know why but I haven't had time to test
it. Will try and get it fixed in the next day or two.

cheers
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help