Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 3 authors, 2022-05-04

Re: Apply d799769188529abc6cbf035a10087a51f7832b6b to 5.17 and 5.15?

From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2022-04-21 07:47:37
Also in: llvm, stable

Nathan Chancellor [off-list ref] writes:
Hi Greg, Sasha, and Michael,

Commit d79976918852 ("powerpc/64: Add UADDR64 relocation support") fixes
a boot failure with CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y kernels linked with recent
versions of ld.lld [1]. Additionally, it resolves a separate boot
failure that Paul Menzel reported [2] with ld.lld 13.0.0. Is this a
reasonable backport for 5.17 and 5.15? It applies cleanly, resolves both
problems, and does not appear to cause any other issues in my testing
for both trees but I was curious what Michael's opinion was, as I am far
from a PowerPC expert.

This change does apply cleanly to 5.10 (I did not try earlier branches)
but there are other changes needed for ld.lld to link CONFIG_RELOCATABLE
kernels in that branch so to avoid any regressions, I think it is safe
to just focus on 5.15 and 5.17.
I considered tagging it for stable, but I wanted it to get a bit of
testing first, it's a reasonably big patch.

I think we're reasonably confident it doesn't introduce any new bugs,
but more testing time is always good.

So I guess I'd be inclined to wait another week or so before requesting
a stable backport?

cheers
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help