On 07/04/2022 11:28, Jakob Koschel wrote:
In preparation to limit the scope of a list iterator to the list
traversal loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found element [1].
Before, the code implicitly used the head when no element was found
when using &pos->list. Since the new variable is only set if an
element was found, the list_add() is performed within the loop
and only done after the loop if it is done on the list head directly.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/ (local) [1]
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <redacted>
The commit message doesn't accurately describe the patch; it states
that "the list_add() is performed within the loop", which doesn't
appear to be the case.
Also it seems a bit subtle to use `head` as both the head of the
list to iterate over and the found entry/gap to insert before; a
comment explaining that wouldn't go amiss.
(I'd question whether this change is really an improvement in this
case, where the iterator really does hold the thing we want at the
end of the search and so there's no if(found) special-casing —
we're not even abusing the type system, because efx->rss_context
is of the same type as all the list entries, so ctx really is a
valid pointer and there shouldn't be any issues with speculative
accesses or whatever — but it seems Linus has already pronounced
in favour of the scope limiting, and far be it from me to gainsay
him.)
-ed
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx_common.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx_common.c
index 1b22c7be0088..a8822152ff83 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx_common.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx_common.c
@@ -563,8 +563,10 @@ struct efx_rss_context *efx_alloc_rss_context_entry(struct efx_nic *efx)
/* Search for first gap in the numbering */
list_for_each_entry(ctx, head, list) {
- if (ctx->user_id != id)
+ if (ctx->user_id != id) {
+ head = &ctx->list;
break;
+ }
id++;
/* Check for wrap. If this happens, we have nearly 2^32
* allocated RSS contexts, which seems unlikely.@@ -582,7 +584,7 @@ struct efx_rss_context *efx_alloc_rss_context_entry(struct efx_nic *efx)
/* Insert the new entry into the gap */
new->user_id = id;
- list_add_tail(&new->list, &ctx->list);
+ list_add_tail(&new->list, head);
return new;
}