Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: Reject probes on instructions that can't be single stepped
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2022-03-24 22:59:19
Murilo Opsfelder Araújo [off-list ref] writes:
On 3/23/22 08:51, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
...
quoted
+ case 31: + switch ((inst >> 1) & 0x3ff) { + case 4: /* tw */ + return false; + case 68: /* td */ + return false; + case 146: /* mtmsr */ + return false; + case 178: /* mtmsrd */ + return false; + } + break; + } + return true; +} +Can't OP_* definitions from ppc-opcode.h be used for all of these switch-case statements?
Yes please. And add any that are missing. cheers