Re: [BUG] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: write regression since v4.17-rc1
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Date: 2022-03-04 11:12:11
Also in:
lkml, regressions
Hello Tokunori-san, On 20.02.22 13:22, Tokunori Ikegami wrote:
Hi Ahmad-san, Could you please try the version 2 patch attached for the error case? This version is to check the DQ true data 0xFF by chip_good().
I had a similar patch locally as well at first. I just tested yours and I can't reproduce the issue.
But I am not sure if this works or not since the error is possible to be caused by Hi-Z 0xff on floating bus or etc.
That it works for me could be because of Hi-Z 0xff, which is why decided against it.
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
What seems to work for me is checking if chip_good or chip_ready and map_word is equal to 0xFF. I can't justify why this is ok though. (Worst case bus is floating at this point of time and Hi-Z is read as 0xff on CPU data lines...)Sorry I am not sure about this. I thought the chip_ready() itself is correct as implemented as the data sheet in the past. But it did not work correctly so changed to use chip_good() instead as it is also correct.What exactly in the datasheet makes you believe chip_good is not appropriate?I just mentioned about the actual issue behaviors as not worked chip_good() on S29GL964N and not worked chip_ready() on MX29GL512FHT2I-11G before etc. Anyway let me recheck the data sheet details as just checked it again quickly but needed more investigation to understand.As far as I checked still both chip_good() and chip_ready() seem correct but still the root cause is unknown. If as you mentioned the issue was cased by the DQ true data 0xFF I am not sure why the read work without any error after the write operation. Also if the error was caused by the Hi-Z 0xff on floating bus as mentioned I am not sure why the read work without any error after the write operation with chip_ready(). Sorry anyway the root cause is also unknown when the write operation was changed to use chip_good() instead of chip_ready().
I've be ok with v1 then. Restores working behavior for me and shouldn't break others. Cheers and thanks again, Ahmad
Regards, Ikegamiquoted
Regards, Ikegamiquoted
Cheers, Ahmad
-- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |