Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] modules: Introduce data_layout
From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2022-02-03 06:58:59
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml
Le 03/02/2022 à 00:48, Luis Chamberlain a écrit :
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 05:02:07PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:quoted
diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c index 163e32e39064..11f51e17fb9f 100644 --- a/kernel/module.c +++ b/kernel/module.c@@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ /* If this is set, the section belongs in the init part of the module */ #define INIT_OFFSET_MASK (1UL << (BITS_PER_LONG-1)) +#define data_layout core_layout + /* * Mutex protects: * 1) List of modules (also safely readable with preempt_disable),@@ -2451,7 +2454,10 @@ static void layout_sections(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info) || s->sh_entsize != ~0UL || module_init_layout_section(sname)) continue; - s->sh_entsize = get_offset(mod, &mod->core_layout.size, s, i); + if (m) + s->sh_entsize = get_offset(mod, &mod->data_layout.size, s, i); + else + s->sh_entsize = get_offset(mod, &mod->core_layout.size, s, i); pr_debug("\t%s\n", sname);Huh why is this branching here, given you just used mod->data_layout in all other areas?
The module text remains in core_layout, so the text section still needs core_layout. In the masks[][] table, it corresponds to the first line, which has flag SHF_EXECINSTR. In the loop that's when 'm' is 0. In the following switch/case, case 0 still uses core_layout.
quoted
@@ -3468,6 +3474,8 @@ static int move_module(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info) if (shdr->sh_entsize & INIT_OFFSET_MASK) dest = mod->init_layout.base + (shdr->sh_entsize & ~INIT_OFFSET_MASK); + else if (!(shdr->sh_flags & SHF_EXECINSTR)) + dest = mod->data_layout.base + shdr->sh_entsize; else dest = mod->core_layout.base + shdr->sh_entsize;Likewise here.
Same here, the section with flag SHF_EXECINSTR is a text section, it stays in core_layout. Christophe