[PATCH] powerpc/mm: fix early initialization failure for MMUs with no hash table

Subsystems: linux for powerpc (32-bit and 64-bit), the rest

STALE1737d

3 messages, 2 authors, 2021-11-27 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] powerpc/mm: fix early initialization failure for MMUs with no hash table

From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: 2021-11-27 02:07:17

The blamed patch attempted to do a trivial conversion of
map_mem_in_cams() by adding an extra "bool init" argument, but by
mistake, changed the way in which two call sites pass the other boolean
argument, "bool dry_run".

As a result, early_init_this_mmu() now calls map_mem_in_cams() with
dry_run=true, and setup_initial_memory_limit() calls with dry_run=false,
both of which are unintended changes.

This makes the kernel boot process hang here:

[    0.045211] e500 family performance monitor hardware support registered
[    0.051891] rcu: Hierarchical SRCU implementation.
[    0.057791] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...

Issue noticed on a Freescale T1040.

Fixes: 52bda69ae8b5 ("powerpc/fsl_booke: Tell map_mem_in_cams() if init is done")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/tlb.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/tlb.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/tlb.c
index 89353d4f5604..647bf454a0fa 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/tlb.c
@@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ static void early_init_this_mmu(void)
 
 		if (map)
 			linear_map_top = map_mem_in_cams(linear_map_top,
-							 num_cams, true, true);
+							 num_cams, false, true);
 	}
 #endif
 
@@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ void setup_initial_memory_limit(phys_addr_t first_memblock_base,
 		num_cams = (mfspr(SPRN_TLB1CFG) & TLBnCFG_N_ENTRY) / 4;
 
 		linear_sz = map_mem_in_cams(first_memblock_size, num_cams,
-					    false, true);
+					    true, true);
 
 		ppc64_rma_size = min_t(u64, linear_sz, 0x40000000);
 	} else
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: fix early initialization failure for MMUs with no hash table

From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: 2021-11-27 15:51:01

On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 04:04:48AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
quoted hunk
The blamed patch attempted to do a trivial conversion of
map_mem_in_cams() by adding an extra "bool init" argument, but by
mistake, changed the way in which two call sites pass the other boolean
argument, "bool dry_run".

As a result, early_init_this_mmu() now calls map_mem_in_cams() with
dry_run=true, and setup_initial_memory_limit() calls with dry_run=false,
both of which are unintended changes.

This makes the kernel boot process hang here:

[    0.045211] e500 family performance monitor hardware support registered
[    0.051891] rcu: Hierarchical SRCU implementation.
[    0.057791] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...

Issue noticed on a Freescale T1040.

Fixes: 52bda69ae8b5 ("powerpc/fsl_booke: Tell map_mem_in_cams() if init is done")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/tlb.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/tlb.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/tlb.c
index 89353d4f5604..647bf454a0fa 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/tlb.c
@@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ static void early_init_this_mmu(void)
 
 		if (map)
 			linear_map_top = map_mem_in_cams(linear_map_top,
-							 num_cams, true, true);
+							 num_cams, false, true);
 	}
 #endif
 
@@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ void setup_initial_memory_limit(phys_addr_t first_memblock_base,
 		num_cams = (mfspr(SPRN_TLB1CFG) & TLBnCFG_N_ENTRY) / 4;
 
 		linear_sz = map_mem_in_cams(first_memblock_size, num_cams,
-					    false, true);
+					    true, true);
 
 		ppc64_rma_size = min_t(u64, linear_sz, 0x40000000);
 	} else
-- 
2.25.1
This is a duplicate of commit 5b54860943dc ("powerpc/book3e: Fix TLBCAM preset at boot"),
looks like I'm late to the party. That commit unbricks my board, so
please drop this patch.

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: fix early initialization failure for MMUs with no hash table

From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2021-11-27 19:54:10


Le 27/11/2021 à 03:04, Vladimir Oltean a écrit :
The blamed patch attempted to do a trivial conversion of
map_mem_in_cams() by adding an extra "bool init" argument, but by
mistake, changed the way in which two call sites pass the other boolean
argument, "bool dry_run".

As a result, early_init_this_mmu() now calls map_mem_in_cams() with
dry_run=true, and setup_initial_memory_limit() calls with dry_run=false,
both of which are unintended changes.

This makes the kernel boot process hang here:

[    0.045211] e500 family performance monitor hardware support registered
[    0.051891] rcu: Hierarchical SRCU implementation.
[    0.057791] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...

Issue noticed on a Freescale T1040.

Fixes: 52bda69ae8b5 ("powerpc/fsl_booke: Tell map_mem_in_cams() if init is done")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Thanks for you patch.

However, it should already be fixed in 5.16-rc2 with the following 
commit : 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/5b54860943dc4681be5de2fc287408c7ce274dfc

Christophe
quoted hunk
---
  arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/tlb.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/tlb.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/tlb.c
index 89353d4f5604..647bf454a0fa 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/tlb.c
@@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ static void early_init_this_mmu(void)
  
  		if (map)
  			linear_map_top = map_mem_in_cams(linear_map_top,
-							 num_cams, true, true);
+							 num_cams, false, true);
  	}
  #endif
  
@@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ void setup_initial_memory_limit(phys_addr_t first_memblock_base,
  		num_cams = (mfspr(SPRN_TLB1CFG) & TLBnCFG_N_ENTRY) / 4;
  
  		linear_sz = map_mem_in_cams(first_memblock_size, num_cams,
-					    false, true);
+					    true, true);
  
  		ppc64_rma_size = min_t(u64, linear_sz, 0x40000000);
  	} else
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help