[PATCH] powerpc/code-patching: Relax verification of patchability

Subsystems: linux for powerpc (32-bit and 64-bit), the rest

STALE1744d

3 messages, 2 authors, 2021-11-26 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] powerpc/code-patching: Relax verification of patchability

From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2021-11-26 07:41:50

Commit 8b8a8f0ab3f5 ("powerpc/code-patching: Improve verification of
patchability") introduced a stricter verification of the patched
area by checking it is proper kernel text.

But as least two usages of patch_instruction() fall outside:
- Code patching selftests, which use stack and vmalloc space.
- Ftrace

So for the time being, partially revert commit 8b8a8f0ab3f5 and add
a onetime warning:

  Running code patching self-tests ...
  patch_instruction() called on invalid text address 0xe1011e58 from test_code_patching+0x34/0xd6c

Reported-by: Sachin Sant <redacted>
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <redacted>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Fixes: 8b8a8f0ab3f5 ("powerpc/code-patching: Improve verification of patchability")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>
---
 arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
index 1dd636a85cc1..c87eea773930 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
@@ -190,9 +190,13 @@ static int do_patch_instruction(u32 *addr, struct ppc_inst instr)
 int patch_instruction(u32 *addr, struct ppc_inst instr)
 {
 	/* Make sure we aren't patching a freed init section */
-	if (!kernel_text_address((unsigned long)addr))
+	if (system_state >= SYSTEM_FREEING_INITMEM && init_section_contains(addr, 4))
 		return 0;
 
+	if (!kernel_text_address((unsigned long)addr))
+		pr_warn_once("%s() called on invalid text address 0x%p from %pS\n",
+			     __func__, addr, __builtin_return_address(0));
+
 	return do_patch_instruction(addr, instr);
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_instruction);
-- 
2.33.1

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/code-patching: Relax verification of patchability

From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2021-11-26 08:51:09


Le 26/11/2021 à 08:39, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
quoted hunk
Commit 8b8a8f0ab3f5 ("powerpc/code-patching: Improve verification of
patchability") introduced a stricter verification of the patched
area by checking it is proper kernel text.

But as least two usages of patch_instruction() fall outside:
- Code patching selftests, which use stack and vmalloc space.
- Ftrace

So for the time being, partially revert commit 8b8a8f0ab3f5 and add
a onetime warning:

   Running code patching self-tests ...
   patch_instruction() called on invalid text address 0xe1011e58 from test_code_patching+0x34/0xd6c

Reported-by: Sachin Sant <redacted>
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <redacted>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Fixes: 8b8a8f0ab3f5 ("powerpc/code-patching: Improve verification of patchability")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>
---
  arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 6 +++++-
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
index 1dd636a85cc1..c87eea773930 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
@@ -190,9 +190,13 @@ static int do_patch_instruction(u32 *addr, struct ppc_inst instr)
  int patch_instruction(u32 *addr, struct ppc_inst instr)
  {
  	/* Make sure we aren't patching a freed init section */
-	if (!kernel_text_address((unsigned long)addr))
+	if (system_state >= SYSTEM_FREEING_INITMEM && init_section_contains(addr, 4))
  		return 0;
  
+	if (!kernel_text_address((unsigned long)addr))
+		pr_warn_once("%s() called on invalid text address 0x%p from %pS\n",
+			     __func__, addr, __builtin_return_address(0));
+
May it be better to use pr_warn_ratelimited() instead in order to catch 
more than the first occurence ?
  	return do_patch_instruction(addr, instr);
  }
  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_instruction);

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/code-patching: Relax verification of patchability

From: Sachin Sant <hidden>
Date: 2021-11-26 18:02:51

 Running code patching self-tests ...
 patch_instruction() called on invalid text address 0xe1011e58 from test_code_patching+0x34/0xd6c

Reported-by: Sachin Sant <redacted>
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <redacted>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Fixes: 8b8a8f0ab3f5 ("powerpc/code-patching: Improve verification of patchability")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
This fixes the problem for me.

Tested-by: Sachin Sant <redacted>

Thanks
-Sachin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help