Re: [PATCH] locking: remove spin_lock_flags() etc
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2021-10-25 09:58:19
Also in:
linux-s390, lkml
On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 06:04:57PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 3:37 AM Waiman Long [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
On 10/22/21 7:59 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> As this is all dead code, just remove it and the helper functions built around it. For arch/ia64, the inline asm could be cleaned up, but it seems safer to leave it untouched. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>Does that mean we can also remove the GENERIC_LOCKBREAK config option from the Kconfig files as well?I couldn't figure this out. What I see is that the only architectures setting GENERIC_LOCKBREAK are nds32, parisc, powerpc, s390, sh and sparc64, while the only architectures implementing arch_spin_is_contended() are arm32, csky and ia64. The part I don't understand is whether the option actually does anything useful any more after commit d89c70356acf ("locking/core: Remove break_lock field when CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK=y").
Urgh, what a mess.. AFAICT there's still code in kernel/locking/spinlock.c that relies on it. Specifically when GENERIC_LOCKBREAK=y we seem to create _lock*() variants that are basically TaS locks which drop preempt/irq disable while spinning. Anybody having this on and not having native TaS locks is in for a rude surprise I suppose... sparc64 being the obvious candidate there :/