ASoC: fsl_spdif: Add support for i.MX8ULP

On i.MX8ULP the spdif works with EDMA, so add compatible
string and soc specific data for i.MX8ULP.

Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <redacted>
---
 sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c
index 8ffb1a6048d6..61ba08322f23 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c

@@ -186,6 +186,16 @@ static struct fsl_spdif_soc_data fsl_spdif_imx8mm = {
 	.tx_formats = FSL_SPDIF_FORMATS_PLAYBACK,
 };
 
+static struct fsl_spdif_soc_data fsl_spdif_imx8ulp = {
+	.imx = true,
+	.shared_root_clock = true,
+	.raw_capture_mode = false,
+	.interrupts = 1,
+	.tx_burst = 2,		/* Applied for EDMA */
+	.rx_burst = 2,		/* Applied for EDMA */
+	.tx_formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE,	/* Applied for EDMA */
+};
+
 /* Check if clk is a root clock that does not share clock source with others */
 static inline bool fsl_spdif_can_set_clk_rate(struct fsl_spdif_priv *spdif, int clk)
 {

@@ -1556,6 +1566,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id fsl_spdif_dt_ids[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-spdif", .data = &fsl_spdif_imx6sx, },
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8qm-spdif", .data = &fsl_spdif_imx8qm, },
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-spdif", .data = &fsl_spdif_imx8mm, },
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-spdif", .data = &fsl_spdif_imx8ulp, },
 	{}
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, fsl_spdif_dt_ids);

-- 
2.17.1

On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:49:22 +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:

On i.MX8ULP the spdif works with EDMA, so add compatible
string and soc specific data for i.MX8ULP.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: fsl_spdif: Add support for i.MX8ULP
      commit: a635d66be1642e59af17383a27b2c61409121241

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark