Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] powerpc/numa: Print debug statements only when required
flat view
From: Srikar Dronamraju <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-23 09:39:13
* Laurent Dufour [off-list ref] [2021-08-23 11:21:33]:
Le 21/08/2021 à 12:25, Srikar Dronamraju a écrit :quoted
Currently, a debug message gets printed every time an attempt to add(remove) a CPU. However this is redundant if the CPU is already added (removed) from the node. Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: Nathan Lynch <redacted> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Valentin Schneider <redacted> Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <redacted> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Geetika Moolchandani <redacted> Cc: Laurent Dufour <redacted> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <redacted> --- arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c index f2bf98bdcea2..fbe03f6840e0 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c@@ -141,10 +141,11 @@ static void map_cpu_to_node(int cpu, int node) { update_numa_cpu_lookup_table(cpu, node); - dbg("adding cpu %d to node %d\n", cpu, node); - if (!(cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, node_to_cpumask_map[node]))) + if (!(cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, node_to_cpumask_map[node]))) { + dbg("adding cpu %d to node %d\n", cpu, node); cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, node_to_cpumask_map[node]); + } } #if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) || defined(CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR)@@ -152,13 +153,11 @@ static void unmap_cpu_from_node(unsigned long cpu) { int node = numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu]; - dbg("removing cpu %lu from node %d\n", cpu, node); - if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, node_to_cpumask_map[node])) { cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, node_to_cpumask_map[node]); + dbg("removing cpu %lu from node %d\n", cpu, node); } else { - printk(KERN_ERR "WARNING: cpu %lu not found in node %d\n", - cpu, node); + pr_err("WARNING: cpu %lu not found in node %d\n", cpu, node);Would pr_warn() be more appropriate here (or removing the "WARNING" statement)?
Its a fair point. Michael, Do you want me to resend this patch with s/pr_err/pr_warn for the above line?
quoted
} } #endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU || CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR */
-- Thanks and Regards Srikar Dronamraju