Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] powerpc/64s/perf: add power_pmu_running to query whether perf is being used

Interrupt handling code would like to know whether perf is enabled, to
know whether it should enable MSR[EE] to improve PMI coverage.

Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Athira Rajeev <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h |  2 ++
 arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c   | 13 +++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
index 21cc571ea9c2..2d5c0d3ccbb6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h

@@ -306,6 +306,8 @@ static inline bool lazy_irq_pending_nocheck(void)
 	return __lazy_irq_pending(local_paca->irq_happened);
 }
 
+bool power_pmu_running(void);
+
 /*
  * This is called by asynchronous interrupts to conditionally
  * re-enable hard interrupts after having cleared the source

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index bb0ee716de91..76114a9afb2b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c

@@ -2380,6 +2380,19 @@ static void perf_event_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	perf_sample_event_took(sched_clock() - start_clock);
 }
 
+bool power_pmu_running(void)
+{
+	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw;
+
+	/* Could this simply test local_paca->pmcregs_in_use? */