Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] powerpc/pseries: Consolidate form1 distance initialization into a helper
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-06 16:24:49
On 8/6/21 12:17 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 03:33:11PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:quoted
Currently, we duplicate parsing code for ibm,associativity and ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays in the kernel. The associativity array provided by these device tree properties are very similar and hence can use a helper to parse the node id and numa distance details.Oh... sorry.. comments on the earlier patch were from before I read and saw you adjusted things here.quoted
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <redacted> --- arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c index fffb3c40f595..7506251e17f2 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c@@ -171,19 +171,19 @@ static void unmap_cpu_from_node(unsigned long cpu) } #endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU || CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR */ -/* - * Returns nid in the range [0..nr_node_ids], or -1 if no useful NUMA - * info is found. - */ -static int associativity_to_nid(const __be32 *associativity) +static int __associativity_to_nid(const __be32 *associativity, + int max_array_sz) { int nid = NUMA_NO_NODE; + /* + * primary_domain_index is 1 based array index. + */ + int index = primary_domain_index - 1; - if (!numa_enabled) + if (!numa_enabled || index >= max_array_sz) goto out;You don't need a goto, you can just return NUMA_NO_NODE.
updated
quoted
- if (of_read_number(associativity, 1) >= primary_domain_index) - nid = of_read_number(&associativity[primary_domain_index], 1); + nid = of_read_number(&associativity[index], 1); /* POWER4 LPAR uses 0xffff as invalid node */ if (nid == 0xffff || nid >= nr_node_ids)@@ -191,6 +191,17 @@ static int associativity_to_nid(const __be32 *associativity) out: return nid; } +/* + * Returns nid in the range [0..nr_node_ids], or -1 if no useful NUMA + * info is found. + */ +static int associativity_to_nid(const __be32 *associativity) +{ + int array_sz = of_read_number(associativity, 1); + + /* Skip the first element in the associativity array */ + return __associativity_to_nid((associativity + 1), array_sz); +} static int __cpu_form2_relative_distance(__be32 *cpu1_assoc, __be32 *cpu2_assoc) {@@ -295,24 +306,41 @@ int of_node_to_nid(struct device_node *device) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_node_to_nid); -static void __initialize_form1_numa_distance(const __be32 *associativity) +static void ___initialize_form1_numa_distance(const __be32 *associativity, + int max_array_sz) { int i, nid; if (affinity_form != FORM1_AFFINITY) return; - nid = associativity_to_nid(associativity); + nid = __associativity_to_nid(associativity, max_array_sz); if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) { for (i = 0; i < distance_ref_points_depth; i++) { const __be32 *entry; + int index = be32_to_cpu(distance_ref_points[i]) - 1; + + /* + * broken hierarchy, return with broken distance tableWARN_ON, maybe?
updated
quoted
+ */ + if (index >= max_array_sz) + return; - entry = &associativity[be32_to_cpu(distance_ref_points[i])]; + entry = &associativity[index]; distance_lookup_table[nid][i] = of_read_number(entry, 1); } } } +static void __initialize_form1_numa_distance(const __be32 *associativity)Do you actually use this in-between wrapper?
yes used in
static void initialize_form1_numa_distance(struct device_node *node)
{
const __be32 *associativity;
associativity = of_get_associativity(node);
if (!associativity)
return;
__initialize_form1_numa_distance(associativity);
}
quoted
+{ + int array_sz; + + array_sz = of_read_number(associativity, 1); + /* Skip the first element in the associativity array */ + ___initialize_form1_numa_distance(associativity + 1, array_sz); +} + static void initialize_form1_numa_distance(struct device_node *node) { const __be32 *associativity;@@ -586,27 +614,18 @@ static int get_nid_and_numa_distance(struct drmem_lmb *lmb) if (primary_domain_index <= aa.array_sz && !(lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_AI_INVALID) && lmb->aa_index < aa.n_arrays) { - index = lmb->aa_index * aa.array_sz + primary_domain_index - 1; - nid = of_read_number(&aa.arrays[index], 1); + const __be32 *associativity; - if (nid == 0xffff || nid >= nr_node_ids) - nid = default_nid; + index = lmb->aa_index * aa.array_sz; + associativity = &aa.arrays[index]; + nid = __associativity_to_nid(associativity, aa.array_sz); if (nid > 0 && affinity_form == FORM1_AFFINITY) { - int i; - const __be32 *associativity; - - index = lmb->aa_index * aa.array_sz; - associativity = &aa.arrays[index]; /* - * lookup array associativity entries have different format - * There is no length of the array as the first element. + * lookup array associativity entries have + * no length of the array as the first element. */ - for (i = 0; i < distance_ref_points_depth; i++) { - const __be32 *entry; - - entry = &associativity[be32_to_cpu(distance_ref_points[i]) - 1]; - distance_lookup_table[nid][i] = of_read_number(entry, 1); - } + ___initialize_form1_numa_distance(associativity, + aa.array_sz);Better, thanks.quoted
} } return nid;@@ -632,11 +651,11 @@ int of_drconf_to_nid_single(struct drmem_lmb *lmb) if (primary_domain_index <= aa.array_sz && !(lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_AI_INVALID) && lmb->aa_index < aa.n_arrays) { - index = lmb->aa_index * aa.array_sz + primary_domain_index - 1; - nid = of_read_number(&aa.arrays[index], 1); + const __be32 *associativity; - if (nid == 0xffff || nid >= nr_node_ids) - nid = default_nid; + index = lmb->aa_index * aa.array_sz; + associativity = &aa.arrays[index]; + nid = __associativity_to_nid(associativity, aa.array_sz); } return nid; }
-aneesh