Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Remove MSR_PR check in interrupt_exit_{user/kernel}_prepare()
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-08-04 08:53:56
Also in:
lkml
Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of August 4, 2021 6:37 pm:
Le 04/08/2021 à 10:08, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :quoted
Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of August 4, 2021 3:27 pm:quoted
In those hot functions that are called at every interrupt, any saved cycle is worth it. interrupt_exit_user_prepare() and interrupt_exit_kernel_prepare() are called from three places: - From entry_32.S - From interrupt_64.S - From interrupt_exit_user_restart() and interrupt_exit_kernel_restart() In entry_32.S, there are inambiguously called based on MSR_PR: interrupt_return: lwz r4,_MSR(r1) addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD andi. r0,r4,MSR_PR beq .Lkernel_interrupt_return bl interrupt_exit_user_prepare ... .Lkernel_interrupt_return: bl interrupt_exit_kernel_prepare In interrupt_64.S, that's similar: interrupt_return_\srr\(): ld r4,_MSR(r1) andi. r0,r4,MSR_PR beq interrupt_return_\srr\()_kernel interrupt_return_\srr\()_user: /* make backtraces match the _kernel variant */ addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD bl interrupt_exit_user_prepare ... interrupt_return_\srr\()_kernel: addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD bl interrupt_exit_kernel_prepare In interrupt_exit_user_restart() and interrupt_exit_kernel_restart(), MSR_PR is verified respectively by BUG_ON(!user_mode(regs)) and BUG_ON(user_mode(regs)) prior to calling interrupt_exit_user_prepare() and interrupt_exit_kernel_prepare(). The verification in interrupt_exit_user_prepare() and interrupt_exit_kernel_prepare() are therefore useless and can be removed. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>Probably okay to do now things are ironing out. Unless we want to make a new define for interrupt handler debug and put a bunch of these asserts under it. There's quite a lot more here, and in asm/interrupt.h, etc.But that one is so trivial that I'm not sure there is any point in keeping it even as a kind of additional DEBUG level, unless you want those BUG_ONs because you don't trust the compiler.
Fair point. Acked-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>