Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Don't use r30 to avoid breaking Go lang
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Date: 2021-07-29 16:26:30
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 6:42 AM Paul Menzel [off-list ref] wrote:
Dear Michael, Am 29.07.21 um 15:12 schrieb Michael Ellerman:quoted
The Go runtime uses r30 for some special value called 'g'. It assumes that value will remain unchanged even when calling VDSO functions. Although r30 is non-volatile across function calls, the callee is free to use it, as long as the callee saves the value and restores it before returning. It used to be true by accident that the VDSO didn't use r30, because the VDSO was hand-written asm. When we switched to building the VDSO from C the compiler started using r30, at least in some builds, leading to crashes in Go. eg: ~/go/src$ ./all.bash Building Go cmd/dist using /usr/lib/go-1.16. (go1.16.2 linux/ppc64le) Building Go toolchain1 using /usr/lib/go-1.16. go build os/exec: /usr/lib/go-1.16/pkg/tool/linux_ppc64le/compile: signal: segmentation fault go build reflect: /usr/lib/go-1.16/pkg/tool/linux_ppc64le/compile: signal: segmentation fault go tool dist: FAILED: /usr/lib/go-1.16/bin/go install -gcflags=-l -tags=math_big_pure_go compiler_bootstrap bootstrap/cmd/...: exit status 1 There are patches in flight to fix Go[1], but until they are released and widely deployed we can workaround it in the VDSO by avoiding use ofNit: work around is spelled with a space.quoted
r30. Note this only works with GCC, clang does not support -ffixed-rN.Maybe the clang/LLVM build support folks (in CC) have an idea.
Right, we've had issues with these in the past. Generally, we need to teach clang about which registers are valid for `N` so that it can diagnose invalid values ASAP. This has to be done on a per arch basis in LLVM to steal the register from the register allocator. For example, this was used previously for aarch64 (but removed from use in the kernel) and IIRC is used for m68k (which we're working to get builds online for). I've filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51272. Thanks for the report.
quoted
1: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/328110 Fixes: ab037dd87a2f ("powerpc/vdso: Switch VDSO to generic C implementation.") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.11+ Reported-by: Paul Menzel <redacted> Tested-by: Paul Menzel <redacted> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/Makefile | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/Makefile index 2813e3f98db6..3c5baaa6f1e7 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/Makefile +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/Makefile@@ -27,6 +27,13 @@ KASAN_SANITIZE := n ccflags-y := -shared -fno-common -fno-builtin -nostdlib \ -Wl,-soname=linux-vdso64.so.1 -Wl,--hash-style=both + +# Go prior to 1.16.x assumes r30 is not clobbered by any VDSO code. That used to be true +# by accident when the VDSO was hand-written asm code, but may not be now that the VDSO is +# compiler generated. To avoid breaking Go tell GCC not to use r30. Impact on code +# generation is minimal, it will just use r29 instead. +ccflags-y += $(call cc-option, -ffixed-r30) + asflags-y := -D__VDSO64__ -s targets += vdso64.ldsThe rest looks good. Kind regards, Paul
-- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers