Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: Fix lockup on kernel exec fault
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-07-02 01:28:07
Also in:
lkml
Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of July 1, 2021 9:17 pm:
The powerpc kernel is not prepared to handle exec faults from kernel.
Especially, the function is_exec_fault() will return 'false' when an
exec fault is taken by kernel, because the check is based on reading
current->thread.regs->trap which contains the trap from user.
For instance, when provoking a LKDTM EXEC_USERSPACE test,
current->thread.regs->trap is set to SYSCALL trap (0xc00), and
the fault taken by the kernel is not seen as an exec fault by
set_access_flags_filter().
Commit d7df2443cd5f ("powerpc/mm: Fix spurrious segfaults on radix
with autonuma") made it clear and handled it properly. But later on
commit d3ca587404b3 ("powerpc/mm: Fix reporting of kernel execute
faults") removed that handling, introducing test based on error_code.
And here is the problem, because on the 603 all upper bits of SRR1
get cleared when the TLB instruction miss handler bails out to ISI.So the problem is 603 doesn't see the DSISR_NOEXEC_OR_G bit? I don't see the problem with this for 64s, I don't think anything sane can be done for any 0x400 interrupt in the kernel so it's probably good to catch all here just in case. For 64s, Acked-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Why is 32s clearing those top bits? And it seems to be setting DSISR that AFAIKS it does not use. Seems like it would be good to add a NOEXEC_OR_G bit into SRR1. Thanks, Nick
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Until commit cbd7e6ca0210 ("powerpc/fault: Avoid heavy search_exception_tables() verification"), an exec fault from kernel at a userspace address was indirectly caught by the lack of entry for that address in the exception tables. But after that commit the kernel mainly rely on KUAP or on core mm handling to catch wrong user accesses. Here the access is not wrong, so mm handles it. It is a minor fault because PAGE_EXEC is not set, set_access_flags_filter() should set PAGE_EXEC and voila. But as is_exec_fault() returns false as explained in the begining, set_access_flags_filter() bails out without setting PAGE_EXEC flag, which leads to a forever minor exec fault. As the kernel is not prepared to handle such exec faults, the thing to do is to fire in bad_kernel_fault() for any exec fault taken by the kernel, as it was prior to commit d3ca587404b3. Fixes: d3ca587404b3 ("powerpc/mm: Fix reporting of kernel execute faults") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted> --- arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c index 34f641d4a2fe..a8d0ce85d39a 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c@@ -199,9 +199,7 @@ static bool bad_kernel_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, { int is_exec = TRAP(regs) == INTERRUPT_INST_STORAGE; - /* NX faults set DSISR_PROTFAULT on the 8xx, DSISR_NOEXEC_OR_G on others */ - if (is_exec && (error_code & (DSISR_NOEXEC_OR_G | DSISR_KEYFAULT | - DSISR_PROTFAULT))) { + if (is_exec) { pr_crit_ratelimited("kernel tried to execute %s page (%lx) - exploit attempt? (uid: %d)\n", address >= TASK_SIZE ? "exec-protected" : "user", address,-- 2.25.0