[PATCH] powerpc/xive: Do not skip CPU-less nodes when creating the IPIs

Subsystems: linux for powerpc (32-bit and 64-bit), the rest

STALE1878d

7 messages, 4 authors, 2021-08-06 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] powerpc/xive: Do not skip CPU-less nodes when creating the IPIs

From: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Date: 2021-06-29 13:16:09

On PowerVM, CPU-less nodes can be populated with hot-plugged CPUs at
runtime. Today, the IPI is not created for such nodes, and hot-plugged
CPUs use a bogus IPI, which leads to soft lockups.

We could create the node IPI on demand but it is a bit complex because
this code would be called under bringup_up() and some IRQ locking is
being done. The simplest solution is to create the IPIs for all nodes
at startup.

Fixes: 7dcc37b3eff9 ("powerpc/xive: Map one IPI interrupt per node")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.13
Reported-by: Geetika Moolchandani <redacted>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
---

This patch breaks old versions of irqbalance (<= v1.4). Possible nodes
are collected from /sys/devices/system/node/ but CPU-less nodes are
not listed there. When interrupts are scanned, the link representing
the node structure is NULL and segfault occurs.

Version 1.7 seems immune. 

---
 arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
index f3b16ed48b05..5d2c58dba57e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
@@ -1143,10 +1143,6 @@ static int __init xive_request_ipi(void)
 		struct xive_ipi_desc *xid = &xive_ipis[node];
 		struct xive_ipi_alloc_info info = { node };
 
-		/* Skip nodes without CPUs */
-		if (cpumask_empty(cpumask_of_node(node)))
-			continue;
-
 		/*
 		 * Map one IPI interrupt per node for all cpus of that node.
 		 * Since the HW interrupt number doesn't have any meaning,
-- 
2.31.1

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/xive: Do not skip CPU-less nodes when creating the IPIs

From: Srikar Dronamraju <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-30 05:42:52

* C?dric Le Goater [off-list ref] [2021-06-29 15:15:42]:
On PowerVM, CPU-less nodes can be populated with hot-plugged CPUs at
runtime. Today, the IPI is not created for such nodes, and hot-plugged
CPUs use a bogus IPI, which leads to soft lockups.

We could create the node IPI on demand but it is a bit complex because
this code would be called under bringup_up() and some IRQ locking is
being done. The simplest solution is to create the IPIs for all nodes
at startup.
Thanks for quickly coming up with the fix.
Fixes: 7dcc37b3eff9 ("powerpc/xive: Map one IPI interrupt per node")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.13
Reported-by: Geetika Moolchandani <redacted>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Tested-by: Srikar Dronamraju <redacted>
quoted hunk
---

This patch breaks old versions of irqbalance (<= v1.4). Possible nodes
are collected from /sys/devices/system/node/ but CPU-less nodes are
not listed there. When interrupts are scanned, the link representing
the node structure is NULL and segfault occurs.

Version 1.7 seems immune. 

---
 arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
index f3b16ed48b05..5d2c58dba57e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
@@ -1143,10 +1143,6 @@ static int __init xive_request_ipi(void)
 		struct xive_ipi_desc *xid = &xive_ipis[node];
 		struct xive_ipi_alloc_info info = { node };
 
-		/* Skip nodes without CPUs */
-		if (cpumask_empty(cpumask_of_node(node)))
-			continue;
-
 		/*
 		 * Map one IPI interrupt per node for all cpus of that node.
 		 * Since the HW interrupt number doesn't have any meaning,
-- 
2.31.1
-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/xive: Do not skip CPU-less nodes when creating the IPIs

From: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Date: 2021-07-07 17:37:33

On 29/06/2021 15:15, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
quoted hunk
On PowerVM, CPU-less nodes can be populated with hot-plugged CPUs at
runtime. Today, the IPI is not created for such nodes, and hot-plugged
CPUs use a bogus IPI, which leads to soft lockups.

We could create the node IPI on demand but it is a bit complex because
this code would be called under bringup_up() and some IRQ locking is
being done. The simplest solution is to create the IPIs for all nodes
at startup.

Fixes: 7dcc37b3eff9 ("powerpc/xive: Map one IPI interrupt per node")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.13
Reported-by: Geetika Moolchandani <redacted>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
---

This patch breaks old versions of irqbalance (<= v1.4). Possible nodes
are collected from /sys/devices/system/node/ but CPU-less nodes are
not listed there. When interrupts are scanned, the link representing
the node structure is NULL and segfault occurs.

Version 1.7 seems immune. 

---
 arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
index f3b16ed48b05..5d2c58dba57e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
@@ -1143,10 +1143,6 @@ static int __init xive_request_ipi(void)
 		struct xive_ipi_desc *xid = &xive_ipis[node];
 		struct xive_ipi_alloc_info info = { node };
 
-		/* Skip nodes without CPUs */
-		if (cpumask_empty(cpumask_of_node(node)))
-			continue;
-
 		/*
 		 * Map one IPI interrupt per node for all cpus of that node.
 		 * Since the HW interrupt number doesn't have any meaning,
Tested-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/xive: Do not skip CPU-less nodes when creating the IPIs

From: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Date: 2021-07-19 07:34:36

On 29/06/2021 15:15, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
quoted hunk
On PowerVM, CPU-less nodes can be populated with hot-plugged CPUs at
runtime. Today, the IPI is not created for such nodes, and hot-plugged
CPUs use a bogus IPI, which leads to soft lockups.

We could create the node IPI on demand but it is a bit complex because
this code would be called under bringup_up() and some IRQ locking is
being done. The simplest solution is to create the IPIs for all nodes
at startup.

Fixes: 7dcc37b3eff9 ("powerpc/xive: Map one IPI interrupt per node")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.13
Reported-by: Geetika Moolchandani <redacted>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
---

This patch breaks old versions of irqbalance (<= v1.4). Possible nodes
are collected from /sys/devices/system/node/ but CPU-less nodes are
not listed there. When interrupts are scanned, the link representing
the node structure is NULL and segfault occurs.

Version 1.7 seems immune. 

---
 arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
index f3b16ed48b05..5d2c58dba57e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
@@ -1143,10 +1143,6 @@ static int __init xive_request_ipi(void)
 		struct xive_ipi_desc *xid = &xive_ipis[node];
 		struct xive_ipi_alloc_info info = { node };
 
-		/* Skip nodes without CPUs */
-		if (cpumask_empty(cpumask_of_node(node)))
-			continue;
-
 		/*
 		 * Map one IPI interrupt per node for all cpus of that node.
 		 * Since the HW interrupt number doesn't have any meaning,
What happened to this fix? Will it be merged?

Thanks,
Laurent

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/xive: Do not skip CPU-less nodes when creating the IPIs

From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2021-08-02 06:37:58

Cédric Le Goater [off-list ref] writes:
On PowerVM, CPU-less nodes can be populated with hot-plugged CPUs at
runtime. Today, the IPI is not created for such nodes, and hot-plugged
CPUs use a bogus IPI, which leads to soft lockups.

We could create the node IPI on demand but it is a bit complex because
this code would be called under bringup_up() and some IRQ locking is
being done. The simplest solution is to create the IPIs for all nodes
at startup.

Fixes: 7dcc37b3eff9 ("powerpc/xive: Map one IPI interrupt per node")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.13
Reported-by: Geetika Moolchandani <redacted>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
---

This patch breaks old versions of irqbalance (<= v1.4). Possible nodes
are collected from /sys/devices/system/node/ but CPU-less nodes are
not listed there. When interrupts are scanned, the link representing
the node structure is NULL and segfault occurs.
Breaking userspace is usually frowned upon, even if it is irqbalance.

If CPU-less nodes appeared in /sys/devices/system/node would that fix
it? Could we do that or is that not possible for other reasons?
Version 1.7 seems immune. 
Which was released in August 2020.

Looks like some distros still ship 1.6, I take it you're not sure if
that is broken or not.

cheers

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/xive: Do not skip CPU-less nodes when creating the IPIs

From: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Date: 2021-08-02 13:35:13

On 8/2/21 8:37 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Cédric Le Goater [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On PowerVM, CPU-less nodes can be populated with hot-plugged CPUs at
runtime. Today, the IPI is not created for such nodes, and hot-plugged
CPUs use a bogus IPI, which leads to soft lockups.

We could create the node IPI on demand but it is a bit complex because
this code would be called under bringup_up() and some IRQ locking is
being done. The simplest solution is to create the IPIs for all nodes
at startup.

Fixes: 7dcc37b3eff9 ("powerpc/xive: Map one IPI interrupt per node")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.13
Reported-by: Geetika Moolchandani <redacted>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
---

This patch breaks old versions of irqbalance (<= v1.4). Possible nodes
are collected from /sys/devices/system/node/ but CPU-less nodes are
not listed there. When interrupts are scanned, the link representing
the node structure is NULL and segfault occurs.
Breaking userspace is usually frowned upon, even if it is irqbalance.

If CPU-less nodes appeared in /sys/devices/system/node would that fix
it? Could we do that or is that not possible for other reasons?
quoted
Version 1.7 seems immune. 
Which was released in August 2020.

Looks like some distros still ship 1.6, I take it you're not sure if
that is broken or not.
I did a bisect on irqbalance and the "bad" commit was introduced between 
version 1.7 and version 1.8 :

  commit 31dea01f3a47 ("Also fetch node info for non-PCI devices") 
  https://github.com/Irqbalance/irqbalance/commit/31dea01f3a47aa6374560638486879e5129f9c94

which was backported on RHEL 8 in RPM irqbalance-1.4.0-6.el8.

Any distro using irqbalance <= 1.7 without the patch above is fine. 

Since irqbalance handled cleanly irqs referencing offline nodes before 
this patch, I am inclined to think that the irqbalance fix is incomplete. 
Unfortunately, the commit log lacks some context on the non-PCI devices. 

Thanks,

C. 

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/xive: Do not skip CPU-less nodes when creating the IPIs

From: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Date: 2021-08-06 12:29:09

On 6/29/21 3:15 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On PowerVM, CPU-less nodes can be populated with hot-plugged CPUs at
runtime. Today, the IPI is not created for such nodes, and hot-plugged
CPUs use a bogus IPI, which leads to soft lockups.

We could create the node IPI on demand but it is a bit complex because
this code would be called under bringup_up() and some IRQ locking is
being done. The simplest solution is to create the IPIs for all nodes
at startup.

Fixes: 7dcc37b3eff9 ("powerpc/xive: Map one IPI interrupt per node")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.13
Reported-by: Geetika Moolchandani <redacted>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
---

This patch breaks old versions of irqbalance (<= v1.4). Possible nodes
are collected from /sys/devices/system/node/ but CPU-less nodes are
not listed there. When interrupts are scanned, the link representing
the node structure is NULL and segfault occurs.
This is an irqbalance regression due to :

  https://github.com/Irqbalance/irqbalance/pull/172

I will report through an issue. 

Anyhow, there is a better approach which is to allocate IPIs for all 
nodes at boot time and do the mapping on demand. Removing the mapping 
on last use seems more complex though. 

I will send a v2 after some tests.  

Thanks,

C.
quoted hunk
Version 1.7 seems immune. 

---
 arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
index f3b16ed48b05..5d2c58dba57e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
@@ -1143,10 +1143,6 @@ static int __init xive_request_ipi(void)
 		struct xive_ipi_desc *xid = &xive_ipis[node];
 		struct xive_ipi_alloc_info info = { node };
 
-		/* Skip nodes without CPUs */
-		if (cpumask_empty(cpumask_of_node(node)))
-			continue;
-
 		/*
 		 * Map one IPI interrupt per node for all cpus of that node.
 		 * Since the HW interrupt number doesn't have any meaning,

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help