Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 4 authors, 2021-06-21

Re: [PATCH v13 01/12] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb init functions

From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Date: 2021-06-18 14:09:30
Also in: dri-devel, intel-gfx, linux-devicetree, linux-iommu, linux-pci, lkml, xen-devel

On 6/18/21 1:25 AM, Claire Chang wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 7:30 AM Stefano Stabellini
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021, Claire Chang wrote:
quoted
Add a new function, swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem, for the io_tlb_mem struct
initialization to make the code reusable.

Signed-off-by: Claire Chang <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index 52e2ac526757..47bb2a766798 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -168,9 +168,28 @@ void __init swiotlb_update_mem_attributes(void)
      memset(vaddr, 0, bytes);
 }

-int __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs, int verbose)
+static void swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem(struct io_tlb_mem *mem, phys_addr_t start,
+                                 unsigned long nslabs, bool late_alloc)
 {
+     void *vaddr = phys_to_virt(start);
      unsigned long bytes = nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT, i;
+
+     mem->nslabs = nslabs;
+     mem->start = start;
+     mem->end = mem->start + bytes;
+     mem->index = 0;
+     mem->late_alloc = late_alloc;
+     spin_lock_init(&mem->lock);
+     for (i = 0; i < mem->nslabs; i++) {
+             mem->slots[i].list = IO_TLB_SEGSIZE - io_tlb_offset(i);
+             mem->slots[i].orig_addr = INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
+             mem->slots[i].alloc_size = 0;
+     }
+     memset(vaddr, 0, bytes);
+}
+
+int __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs, int verbose)
+{
      struct io_tlb_mem *mem;
      size_t alloc_size;
@@ -186,16 +205,8 @@ int __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs, int verbose)
      if (!mem)
              panic("%s: Failed to allocate %zu bytes align=0x%lx\n",
                    __func__, alloc_size, PAGE_SIZE);
-     mem->nslabs = nslabs;
-     mem->start = __pa(tlb);
-     mem->end = mem->start + bytes;
-     mem->index = 0;
-     spin_lock_init(&mem->lock);
-     for (i = 0; i < mem->nslabs; i++) {
-             mem->slots[i].list = IO_TLB_SEGSIZE - io_tlb_offset(i);
-             mem->slots[i].orig_addr = INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
-             mem->slots[i].alloc_size = 0;
-     }
+
+     swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem(mem, __pa(tlb), nslabs, false);

      io_tlb_default_mem = mem;
      if (verbose)
@@ -282,8 +293,8 @@ swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size(size_t default_size)
 int
 swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs)
 {
-     unsigned long bytes = nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT, i;
      struct io_tlb_mem *mem;
+     unsigned long bytes = nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT;

      if (swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE)
              return 0;
@@ -297,20 +308,9 @@ swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs)
      if (!mem)
              return -ENOMEM;

-     mem->nslabs = nslabs;
-     mem->start = virt_to_phys(tlb);
-     mem->end = mem->start + bytes;
-     mem->index = 0;
-     mem->late_alloc = 1;
-     spin_lock_init(&mem->lock);
-     for (i = 0; i < mem->nslabs; i++) {
-             mem->slots[i].list = IO_TLB_SEGSIZE - io_tlb_offset(i);
-             mem->slots[i].orig_addr = INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
-             mem->slots[i].alloc_size = 0;
-     }
-
+     memset(mem, 0, sizeof(*mem));
+     swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem(mem, virt_to_phys(tlb), nslabs, true);
      set_memory_decrypted((unsigned long)tlb, bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT);
-     memset(tlb, 0, bytes);
This is good for swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl. However I have just noticed
that mem could also be allocated from swiotlb_init_with_tbl, in which
case the zeroing is missing. I think we need another memset in
swiotlb_init_with_tbl as well. Or maybe it could be better to have a
single memset at the beginning of swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem instead. Up to
you.
swiotlb_init_with_tbl uses memblock_alloc to allocate the io_tlb_mem
and memblock_alloc[1] will do memset in memblock_alloc_try_nid[2], so
swiotlb_init_with_tbl is also good.
I'm happy to add the memset in swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem if you think
it's clearer and safer.
On x86, if the memset is done before set_memory_decrypted() and memory
encryption is active, then the memory will look like ciphertext afterwards
and not be zeroes. If zeroed memory is required, then a memset must be
done after the set_memory_decrypted() calls.

Thanks,
Tom
[1] https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Fv5.13-rc6%2Fsource%2Finclude%2Flinux%2Fmemblock.h%23L407&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7C3e33e04212b84f9e4ed108d932230511%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637595948355050693%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=TGBDj18KuSHTb45EBz%2Bypfbr4Xgqb1aGTRDCTIpIgJo%3D&amp;reserved=0
[2] https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Fv5.13-rc6%2Fsource%2Fmm%2Fmemblock.c%23L1555&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7C3e33e04212b84f9e4ed108d932230511%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637595948355060689%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=K%2FWbN6iKN9JNtwDSkIaKH2BVLdDTWhn8tPfNdCOVkSA%3D&amp;reserved=0
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help