Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] writes:
Le 15/06/2021 à 09:18, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
quoted
Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
This series is a cleanup of the use of 'struct ppc_inst'.
A confusion is made between internal representation of powerpc
instructions with 'struct ppc_inst' and in-memory code which is
and will always be an array of 'unsigned int'.
Why don't we use u32 *, to make it even more explicit what the expected
size is?
I guess that's historical, we could use u32 *
Yeah I think it is historical, we just never thought about it much.
We can convert it incrementaly maybe ?
I've still got this series in next-test, so I'll go through it and
change any uses of unsigned int * to u32 *, and then we can do another
pass later to change the remaining cases.
cheers