On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 12:02 PM Zhongjun Tan [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Tan Zhongjun <redacted>
The platform_get_irq() prints error message telling that interrupt is
missing, hence there is no need to duplicated that message.
Signed-off-by: Tan Zhongjun <redacted>
Acked-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@gmail.com>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c
index 2a76714eb8e6..29cefd459241 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c
@@ -1368,10 +1368,8 @@ static int fsl_spdif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
for (i = 0; i < spdif_priv->soc->interrupts; i++) {
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
- if (irq < 0) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no irq for node %s\n", pdev->name);
+ if (irq < 0)
return irq;
- }
ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, spdif_isr, 0,
dev_name(&pdev->dev), spdif_priv);
--2.17.1