Re: [PATCH v10 03/10] powerpc: Always define MODULES_{VADDR,END}
From: Jordan Niethe <hidden>
Date: 2021-04-21 05:23:22
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:14 PM Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] wrote:
Le 21/04/2021 à 04:46, Jordan Niethe a écrit :quoted
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 12:36 AM Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Le 30/03/2021 à 06:51, Jordan Niethe a écrit :quoted
If MODULES_{VADDR,END} are not defined set them to VMALLOC_START and VMALLOC_END respectively. This reduces the need for special cases. For example, powerpc's module_alloc() was previously predicated on MODULES_VADDR being defined but now is unconditionally defined. This will be useful reducing conditional code in other places that need to allocate from the module region (i.e., kprobes). Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <redacted> --- v10: New to series --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h | 5 +++++ arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c | 5 +----You probably also have changes to do in kernel/ptdump.c In mm/book3s32/mmu.c and mm/kasan/kasan_init_32.c as well allthough that's harmless here.quoted
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h index 4eed82172e33..014c2921f26a 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h@@ -167,6 +167,11 @@ struct seq_file; void arch_report_meminfo(struct seq_file *m); #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */ +#ifndef MODULES_VADDR +#define MODULES_VADDR VMALLOC_START +#define MODULES_END VMALLOC_END +#endif + #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_PGTABLE_H */diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c index a211b0253cdb..f1fb58389d58 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include <asm/firmware.h> #include <linux/sort.h> #include <asm/setup.h> +#include <linux/mm.h> static LIST_HEAD(module_bug_list);@@ -87,13 +88,9 @@ int module_finalize(const Elf_Ehdr *hdr, return 0; } -#ifdef MODULES_VADDR void *module_alloc(unsigned long size) { - BUILD_BUG_ON(TASK_SIZE > MODULES_VADDR); -The above check is needed somewhere, if you remove it from here you have to perform the check somewhere else.This also introduces this warning: fs/proc/kcore.c:626:52: warning: self-comparison always evaluates to false [-Wtautological-compare] 626 | if (MODULES_VADDR != VMALLOC_START && MODULES_END != VMALLOC_END) { I might leave this patch out of this series and use an #ifdef for now and make this change separately as a follow up.x86/32 at least does the same (see https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.12-rc8/source/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_32_areas.h#L47) They probably also get the warning, so I think would shouldn't bother. One day someone will fix fs/proc/kcore.c , that's not a powerpc problem.
Yeah you are right. I'll add the BUILD_BUG_ON() check to asm/task_size_32.h and keep the patch.
quoted
quoted
quoted
return __vmalloc_node_range(size, 1, MODULES_VADDR, MODULES_END, GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC, VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS, NUMA_NO_NODE, __builtin_return_address(0)); } -#endif