Tyrel Datwyler [off-list ref] writes:
On 4/1/21 5:13 PM, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
quoted
Currently, neither the vio_bus or vio_driver structures provide support
for a shutdown() routine.
Add support for shutdown() by allowing drivers to provide a
implementation via function pointer in their vio_driver struct and
provide a proper implementation in the driver template for the vio_bus
that calls a vio drivers shutdown() if defined.
In the case that no shutdown() is defined by a vio driver and a kexec is
in progress we implement a big hammer that calls remove() to ensure no
further DMA for the devices is possible.
Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
---
Ping... any comments, problems with this approach?
The kexec part seems like a bit of a hack.
It also doesn't help for kdump, when none of the shutdown code is run.
How many drivers do we have? Can we just implement a proper shutdown for
them?
cheers