On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 03:25:27PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2021-03-01 08:42, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted
Use explicit methods for setting and querying the information instead.
Now that everyone's using iommu-dma, is there any point in bouncing this
through the drivers at all? Seems like it would make more sense for the x86
drivers to reflect their private options back to iommu_dma_strict (and
allow Intel's caching mode to override it as well), then have
iommu_dma_init_domain just test !iommu_dma_strict &&
domain->ops->flush_iotlb_all.
Hmm. I looked at this, and kill off ->dma_enable_flush_queue for
the ARM drivers and just looking at iommu_dma_strict seems like a
very clear win.
OTOH x86 is a little more complicated. AMD and intel defaul to lazy
mode, so we'd have to change the global iommu_dma_strict if they are
initialized. Also Intel has not only a "static" option to disable
lazy mode, but also a "dynamic" one where it iterates structure. So
I think on the get side we're stuck with the method, but it still
simplifies the whole thing.