Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix missing declaration of [en/dis]able_kernel_vsx()
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2021-03-09 08:46:11
Also in:
amd-gfx, lkml
Hi Christophe, On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 9:39 AM Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] wrote:
Add stub instances of enable_kernel_vsx() and disable_kernel_vsx()
when CONFIG_VSX is not set, to avoid following build failure.
CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.o
In file included from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dm_services_types.h:29,
from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dm_services.h:37,
from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.c:27:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.c: In function 'dcn_bw_apply_registry_override':
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/os_types.h:64:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'enable_kernel_vsx'; did you mean 'enable_kernel_fp'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
64 | enable_kernel_vsx(); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.c:640:2: note: in expansion of macro 'DC_FP_START'
640 | DC_FP_START();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/os_types.h:75:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'disable_kernel_vsx'; did you mean 'disable_kernel_fp'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
75 | disable_kernel_vsx(); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.c:676:2: note: in expansion of macro 'DC_FP_END'
676 | DC_FP_END();
| ^~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[5]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.o] Error 1
Fixes: 16a9dea110a6 ("amdgpu: Enable initial DCN support on POWER")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>Thanks for your patch!
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/switch_to.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/switch_to.h@@ -71,6 +71,16 @@ static inline void disable_kernel_vsx(void) { msr_check_and_clear(MSR_FP|MSR_VEC|MSR_VSX); } +#else +static inline void enable_kernel_vsx(void) +{ + BUILD_BUG(); +} + +static inline void disable_kernel_vsx(void) +{ + BUILD_BUG(); +} #endif
I'm wondering how this is any better than the current situation: using
BUILD_BUG() will still cause a build failure?
What about adding "depends on !POWERPC || VSX" instead, to prevent
the issue from happening in the first place?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds