Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.12-rc1
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2021-03-02 22:37:47
Also in:
amd-gfx, lkml
Hi Alex, On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 8:30 PM Alex Deucher [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 9:21 AM Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:quoted
Below is the list of build error/warning regressions/improvements in v5.12-rc1[1] compared to v5.11[2]. Summarized: - build errors: +2/-0quoted
[1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/linus/head/fe07bfda2fb9cdef8a4d4008a409bb02f35f1bd8/ (all 192 configs) [2] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/linus/head/f40ddce88593482919761f74910f42f4b84c004b/ (all 192 configs) *** ERRORS *** 2 error regressions: + /kisskb/src/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'disable_kernel_vsx' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 674:2 + /kisskb/src/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'enable_kernel_vsx' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 638:2powerpc-gcc4.9/ppc64_book3e_allmodconfig This was fixed in v5.11-rc1, but reappeared in v5.12-rc1?Do you know what fixed in for 5.11? I guess for PPC64 we depend on CONFIG_VSX?
Looking at the kisskb build logs for v5.11*, it seems compilation never
got to drivers/gpu/drm/ due to internal compiler errors that weren't caught
by my scripts. So the errors listed above were not really fixed.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds