Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 5 authors, 2021-03-10

Re: [PATCH v1 01/15] powerpc/uaccess: Remove __get_user_allowed() and unsafe_op_wrap()

From: Daniel Axtens <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-02 07:11:32
Also in: lkml


Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Those two macros have only one user which is unsafe_get_user().

Put everything in one place and remove them.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 78e2a3990eab..8cbf3e3874f1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -53,9 +53,6 @@ static inline bool __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
 #define __put_user(x, ptr) \
 	__put_user_nocheck((__typeof__(*(ptr)))(x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)))
 
-#define __get_user_allowed(x, ptr) \
-	__get_user_nocheck((x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)), false)
-
 #define __get_user_inatomic(x, ptr) \
 	__get_user_nosleep((x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)))
 #define __put_user_inatomic(x, ptr) \
@@ -482,8 +479,11 @@ user_write_access_begin(const void __user *ptr, size_t len)
 #define user_write_access_begin	user_write_access_begin
 #define user_write_access_end		prevent_current_write_to_user
 
-#define unsafe_op_wrap(op, err) do { if (unlikely(op)) goto err; } while (0)
-#define unsafe_get_user(x, p, e) unsafe_op_wrap(__get_user_allowed(x, p), e)
+#define unsafe_get_user(x, p, e) do {					\
+	if (unlikely(__get_user_nocheck((x), (p), sizeof(*(p)), false)))\
+		goto e;							\
+} while (0)
+
This seems correct to me.

Checkpatch does have one check that is relevant:

CHECK: Macro argument reuse 'p' - possible side-effects?
#36: FILE: arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:482:
+#define unsafe_get_user(x, p, e) do {					\
+	if (unlikely(__get_user_nocheck((x), (p), sizeof(*(p)), false)))\
+		goto e;							\
+} while (0)

Given that we are already creating a new block, should we do something
like this (completely untested):

#define unsafe_get_user(x, p, e) do {					\
        __typeof__(p) __p = (p);
	if (unlikely(__get_user_nocheck((x), (__p), sizeof(*(__p)), false)))\
		goto e;							\
} while (0)

Kind regards,
Daniel
 #define unsafe_put_user(x, p, e) \
 	__unsafe_put_user_goto((__typeof__(*(p)))(x), (p), sizeof(*(p)), e)
 
-- 
2.25.0
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help