Thread (8 messages) flat view 8 messages, 4 authors, 2021-02-08

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] powerpc/kvm: Save Timebase Offset to fix sched_clock() while running guest code.

From: Leonardo Bras <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-08 18:40:45
Also in: lkml

Hello Nick,

On Sat, 2021-02-06 at 13:03 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
Excerpts from Leonardo Bras's message of February 5, 2021 5:01 pm:
quoted
Hey Nick, thanks for reviewing :)

On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 16:28 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
quoted
Excerpts from Leonardo Bras's message of February 5, 2021 4:06 pm:
quoted
Before guest entry, TBU40 register is changed to reflect guest timebase.
After exitting guest, the register is reverted to it's original value.

If one tries to get the timestamp from host between those changes, it
will present an incorrect value.

An example would be trying to add a tracepoint in
kvmppc_guest_entry_inject_int(), which depending on last tracepoint
acquired could actually cause the host to crash.

Save the Timebase Offset to PACA and use it on sched_clock() to always
get the correct timestamp.
Ouch. Not sure how reasonable it is to half switch into guest registers 
and expect to call into the wider kernel, fixing things up as we go. 
What if mftb is used in other places?
IIUC, the CPU is not supposed to call anything as host between guest
entry and guest exit, except guest-related cases, like
When I say "call", I'm including tracing in that. If a function is not 
marked as no trace, then it will call into the tracing subsystem.
quoted
kvmppc_guest_entry_inject_int(), but anyway, if something calls mftb it
will still get the same value as before.
Right, so it'll be out of whack again.
quoted
This is only supposed to change stuff that depends on sched_clock, like
Tracepoints, that can happen in those exceptions.
If they depend on sched_clock that's one thing. Do they definitely have 
no dependencies on mftb from other calls?
We could change that on get_tb() or mftb() @ timebase.h, which would
have a broader reach, but would not reach any mftb from asm code.
quoted
quoted
Especially as it doesn't seem like there is a reason that function _has_
to be called after the timebase is switched to guest, that's just how 
the code is structured.
Correct, but if called, like in rb routines, used by tracepoints, the
difference between last tb and current (lower) tb may cause the CPU to
trap PROGRAM exception, crashing host. 
Yes, so I agree with Michael any function that is involved when we begin 
to switch into guest context (or have not completed switching back to 
host going the other way) should be marked as no trace (noinstr even, 
perhaps).
Sure, that would avoid having to get paca->tb_offset for every mftb()
called, and avoid inconsistencies when different ways to get time are
used in code.

On the other hand, it would make it very hard to debug functions like
kvmppc_guest_entry_inject_int() as I am doing right now.
quoted
quoted
As a local hack to work out a bug okay. If you really need it upstream 
could you put it under a debug config option?
You mean something that is automatically selected whenever those
configs are enabled? 

CONFIG_TRACEPOINT && CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HANDLER && CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64

Or something the user need to select himself in menuconfig?
Yeah I meant a default n thing under powerpc kernel debugging somewhere.
So, IIUC all we can do is split this in 2 changes:
1 - Adding notrace to those functions
2 - Introducing a kernel debug config that reverts (1) and 'fixes' mftb

If that's correct, I have some ideas we can use. 

For debug option, should we add the offset on get_tb() or mftb()?

Another option would be to adding this tb_offset only in the routines
used by tracing. But this could probably mean having to add a function
in arch-generic code, but still an option.

What do you think?
Thanks,
Nick
Thank you!
Leonardo Bras
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help