Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] writes:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 05:50:56PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
quoted
quoted
struct module *find_module(const char *name)
{
- module_assert_mutex();
Does it make sense to replace the assert above with the warn below (untested)?
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(rcu_read_lock_sched_held());
One caller actually holds module_mutex still. And find_module_all,
which implements the actual logic already asserts that either
module_mutex is held or rcu_read_lock, so I don't tink we need an
extra one here.
Ok, thanks for the clarification.
--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center