Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Rid W=1 warnings in Ethernet

On Thu, 14 Jan 2021, Lee Jones wrote:

On Thu, 14 Jan 2021, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 08:33:49 +0000 Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Wed, 13 Jan 2021, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

quoted

On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 16:41:16 +0000 Lee Jones wrote:  

quoted

Resending the stragglers again.                                                                                  

This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1                                                   
kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with                                                   
niggly little warnings.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                 
v2:                                                                                                              
 - Squashed IBM patches                                                                                      
 - Fixed real issue in SMSC
 - Added Andrew's Reviewed-by tags on remainder  

Does not apply, please rebase on net-next/master.  

These are based on Tuesday's next/master.

What's next/master?

I'm not sure if this is a joke, or not? :)

next/master == Linux Next.  The daily merged repo where all of the
*-next branches end up to ensure interoperability.  It's also the
branch that is most heavily tested by the auto-builders to ensure the
vast majority of issues are ironed out before hitting Mainline.

quoted

This is net-next:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/

Looks like net-next gets merged into next/master:

commit 452958f1f3d1c8980a8414f9c37c8c6de24c7d32
Merge: 1eabba209a17a f50e2f9f79164
Author: Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref]
Date:   Thu Jan 14 10:35:40 2021 +1100

    Merge remote-tracking branch 'net-next/master'

So I'm not sure what it's conflicting with.

Do you have patches in net-next that didn't make it into next/master
for some reason?

I'll try to rebase again tomorrow.

Hopefully I am able to reproduce your issue by then.

Okay so my development branch rebased again with no issue.

I also took the liberty to checkout net-next and cherry-pick the
patches [0], which again didn't cause a problem.

I'm not sure what else to suggest.  Is your local copy up-to-date?

[0]

lee@dell:~/projects/linux/kernel [net-next]$ gcp 0cea4b05acd57..924e1f46aba5e
Auto-merging drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c
[net-next 19811db3120a2] net: ethernet: smsc: smc91x: Fix function name in kernel-doc header
 Date: Mon Oct 19 12:47:11 2020 +0100
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[net-next dc6f4490cb64e] net: xen-netback: xenbus: Demote nonconformant kernel-doc headers
 Date: Tue Oct 20 08:00:43 2020 +0100
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[net-next a3363cb09ae59] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw-qos: Demote non-conformant function header
 Date: Tue Oct 20 09:05:38 2020 +0100
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[net-next 005462f886c3e] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpts: Document am65_cpts_rx_enable()'s 'en' parameter
 Date: Tue Oct 20 09:06:57 2020 +0100
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Auto-merging drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
[net-next 9fcc32e395e09] net: ethernet: ibm: ibmvnic: Fix some kernel-doc misdemeanours
 Date: Tue Oct 20 09:42:19 2020 +0100
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
[net-next 15ba865fef481] net: ethernet: toshiba: ps3_gelic_net: Fix some kernel-doc misdemeanours
 Date: Tue Oct 20 10:10:14 2020 +0100
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
[net-next f815eb7cbd7f5] net: ethernet: toshiba: spider_net: Document a whole bunch of function parameters
 Date: Tue Oct 20 10:18:21 2020 +0100
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog