--- Comment #2 from Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) ---
Created attachment 294285
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=294285&action=edit
dmesg (kernel 5.9.16, Talos II)
Hmm... does not seem to happen on kernel 5.9.x.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--- Comment #3 from Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) ---
Created attachment 294449
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=294449&action=edit
dmesg (kernel 5.11-rc1, Talos II)
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
at24: probe of 1-0050 failed with error -17
at24 2-0050: probe
sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/bus/nvmem/devices/module-vpd'
[...]
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210749
Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #294195|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #5 from Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) ---
Created attachment 295621
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=295621&action=edit
kernel .config (kernel 5.12-rc1, Talos II)
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210749
Michael Ellerman (michael@ellerman.id.au) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |michael@ellerman.id.au
--- Comment #6 from Michael Ellerman (michael@ellerman.id.au) ---
Looks like: 61f764c307f6 ("eeprom: at24: Support custom device names for AT24
EEPROMs")
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210749
Michael Ellerman (michael@ellerman.id.au) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from Michael Ellerman (michael@ellerman.id.au) ---
Yeah, reverting that on mainline fixed it.
Not sure how we're going to fix it though, a straight revert isn't going to be
acceptable I suspect.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--- Comment #8 from Michael Ellerman (michael@ellerman.id.au) ---
Actually I also reverted 4e302c3b568e ("misc: eeprom: at24: fix NVMEM name with
custom AT24 device name").
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--- Comment #9 from Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) ---
Created attachment 297867
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=297867&action=edit
dmesg (kernel 5.14-rc1 w. 61f764c307f6, 4e302c3b568e reverted, Talos II)
Yes, I can confirm reverting 61f764c307f6 and 4e302c3b568e works. Tested on
kernel 5.14-rc1.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210749
Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #295621|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #10 from Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) ---
Created attachment 297869
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=297869&action=edit
kernel .config (kernel 5.14-rc1, Talos II)
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210749
Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE
--- Comment #11 from Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) ---
Have not seen this on kernels 5.15.x and 5.16.x.
Closing as obsolete.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.