Thread (6 messages) read the whole thread 6 messages, 3 authors, 2020-10-19

Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: Force inlining of get_order() to work around gcc10 poor decision

From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-19 08:54:55
Also in: linux-arch, lkml


Le 19/10/2020 à 10:32, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 07:50:41AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
quoted
Le 19/10/2020 à 06:55, Joel Stanley a écrit :
quoted
quoted
In the old days, marking a function 'static inline' was forcing
GCC to inline, but since commit ac7c3e4ff401 ("compiler: enable
CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING forcibly") GCC may decide to not inline
a function.

It looks like GCC 10 is taking poor decisions on this.
quoted
quoted
1952 bytes smaller with your patch applied. Did you raise this with
anyone from GCC?
Yes I did, see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445

For the time being, it's at a standstill.
The kernel should just use __always_inline if that is what it *wants*;
that is true here most likely.  GCC could perhaps improve its heuristics
so that it no longer thinks these functions are often too big for
inlining (they *are* pretty big, but not after basic optimisations with
constant integer arguments).
Yes I guess __always_inline is to be added on functions like this defined in headers for exactly 
that, and that's the purpose of this patch.

However I find it odd that get_order() is outlined by GCC even in some object files that don't use 
it at all, for instance in fs/pipe.o

Christophe
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help