[PATCH net-next 0/5] refactoring of ibmvnic code · Lijun Pan <hidden> · 2020-08-19
[PATCH net-next 2/5] ibmvnic: compare adapter->init_done_rc with more readable ibmvnic_rc_codes · Lijun Pan <hidden> · 2020-08-19
[PATCH net-next 1/5] ibmvnic: print caller in several error messages · Lijun Pan <hidden> · 2020-08-19
Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] ibmvnic: print caller in several error messages · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2020-08-19
[PATCH net-next 3/5] ibmvnic: improve ibmvnic_init and ibmvnic_reset_init · Lijun Pan <hidden> · 2020-08-19
Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] ibmvnic: improve ibmvnic_init and ibmvnic_reset_init · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2020-08-19
[PATCH net-next 4/5] ibmvnic: remove never executed if statement · Lijun Pan <hidden> · 2020-08-19
[PATCH net-next 5/5] ibmvnic: merge ibmvnic_reset_init and ibmvnic_init · Lijun Pan <hidden> · 2020-08-19

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] ibmvnic: print caller in several error messages

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2020-08-19 19:10:19
Also in: netdev

From: Lijun Pan <redacted>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:35:08 -0500

The error messages in the changed functions are exactly the same.
In order to differentiate them and make debugging easier,
we print the function names in the error messages.

Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <redacted>

I don't see any value in emitting function names in kernel
error log messages.

Sorry.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help