Thread (7 messages) flat view 7 messages, 2 authors, 2020-07-16

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/sstep: support emulation for vsx vector paired storage access instructions

From: Ravi Bangoria <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-16 07:15:08

Hi Bala,
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -709,6 +722,8 @@ void emulate_vsx_load(struct instruction_op *op, union vsx_reg *reg,
  	reg->d[0] = reg->d[1] = 0;
  
  	switch (op->element_size) {
+	case 32:
+		/* [p]lxvp[x] or [p]stxvp[x] */
This function does not emulate stvxp ^^^^
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
  	case 16:
  		/* whole vector; lxv[x] or lxvl[l] */
  		if (size == 0)
@@ -717,7 +732,7 @@ void emulate_vsx_load(struct instruction_op *op, union vsx_reg *reg,
  		if (IS_LE && (op->vsx_flags & VSX_LDLEFT))
  			rev = !rev;
  		if (rev)
-			do_byte_reverse(reg, 16);
+			do_byte_reverse(reg, size);
  		break;
  	case 8:
  		/* scalar loads, lxvd2x, lxvdsx */
@@ -793,6 +808,22 @@ void emulate_vsx_store(struct instruction_op *op, const union vsx_reg *reg,
  	size = GETSIZE(op->type);
  
  	switch (op->element_size) {
+	case 32:
+		/* [p]lxvp[x] or [p]stxvp[x] */
This function does not emulate lxvp ^^^^
+		if (size == 0)
+			break;
+		if (IS_LE && (op->vsx_flags & VSX_LDLEFT))
+			rev = !rev;
Why this if condition ^^^^ ?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+		if (rev) {
+			/* reverse 32 bytes */
+			buf.d[0] = byterev_8(reg->d[3]);
+			buf.d[1] = byterev_8(reg->d[2]);
+			buf.d[2] = byterev_8(reg->d[1]);
+			buf.d[3] = byterev_8(reg->d[0]);
+			reg = &buf;
+		}
+		memcpy(mem, reg, size);
+		break;
  	case 16:
  		/* stxv, stxvx, stxvl, stxvll */
  		if (size == 0)
@@ -861,28 +892,33 @@ static nokprobe_inline int do_vsx_load(struct instruction_op *op,
  				       bool cross_endian)
  {
  	int reg = op->reg;
-	u8 mem[16];
+	int i, nr_vsx_regs;
+	u8 mem[32];
  	union vsx_reg buf;
  	int size = GETSIZE(op->type);
  
  	if (!address_ok(regs, ea, size) || copy_mem_in(mem, ea, size, regs))
  		return -EFAULT;
  
+	nr_vsx_regs = size / sizeof(__vector128);
  	emulate_vsx_load(op, &buf, mem, cross_endian);
  	preempt_disable();
  	if (reg < 32) {
  		/* FP regs + extensions */
  		if (regs->msr & MSR_FP) {
-			load_vsrn(reg, &buf);
+			for (i = 0; i < nr_vsx_regs; i++)
+				load_vsrn(reg + i, &buf.v[i]);
  		} else {
  			current->thread.fp_state.fpr[reg][0] = buf.d[0];
  			current->thread.fp_state.fpr[reg][1] = buf.d[1];
Should we change else part as well?
  		}
  	} else {
  		if (regs->msr & MSR_VEC)
-			load_vsrn(reg, &buf);
+			for (i = 0; i < nr_vsx_regs; i++)
+				load_vsrn(reg + i, &buf.v[i]);
+
Unnecessary line.
  		else
-			current->thread.vr_state.vr[reg - 32] = buf.v;
+			current->thread.vr_state.vr[reg - 32] = buf.v[0];
Same here. else part, should we add:

     if (vsx 32 byte)
         current->thread.vr_state.vr[reg - 32 + 1] = buf.v[1];
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
  	}
  	preempt_enable();
  	return 0;
@@ -893,27 +929,31 @@ static nokprobe_inline int do_vsx_store(struct instruction_op *op,
  					bool cross_endian)
  {
  	int reg = op->reg;
-	u8 mem[16];
+	int i, nr_vsx_regs;
+	u8 mem[32];
  	union vsx_reg buf;
  	int size = GETSIZE(op->type);
  
  	if (!address_ok(regs, ea, size))
  		return -EFAULT;
  
+	nr_vsx_regs = size / sizeof(__vector128);
  	preempt_disable();
  	if (reg < 32) {
  		/* FP regs + extensions */
  		if (regs->msr & MSR_FP) {
-			store_vsrn(reg, &buf);
+			for (i = 0; i < nr_vsx_regs; i++)
+				store_vsrn(reg + i, &buf.v[i]);
  		} else {
  			buf.d[0] = current->thread.fp_state.fpr[reg][0];
  			buf.d[1] = current->thread.fp_state.fpr[reg][1];
  		}
  	} else {
  		if (regs->msr & MSR_VEC)
-			store_vsrn(reg, &buf);
+			for (i = 0; i < nr_vsx_regs; i++)
+				store_vsrn(reg + i, &buf.v[i]);
  		else
-			buf.v = current->thread.vr_state.vr[reg - 32];
+			buf.v[0] = current->thread.vr_state.vr[reg - 32];
  	}
  	preempt_enable();
  	emulate_vsx_store(op, &buf, mem, cross_endian);
Ravi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help