Re: /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak empty despite kmemleak reports
From: Paul Menzel <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-09 21:10:51
Dear Catalin, Am 09.07.20 um 19:57 schrieb Catalin Marinas:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 04:37:10PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:quoted
Despite Linux 5.8-rc4 reporting memory leaks on the IBM POWER 8 S822LC, the file does not contain more information.quoted
$ dmesg […] > [48662.953323] perf: interrupt took too long (2570 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 77750 [48854.810636] perf: interrupt took too long (3216 > 3212), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 62000 [52300.044518] perf: interrupt took too long (4244 > 4020), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 47000 [52751.373083] perf: interrupt took too long (5373 > 5305), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 37000 [53354.000363] perf: interrupt took too long (6793 > 6716), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 29250 [53850.215606] perf: interrupt took too long (8672 > 8491), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 23000 [57542.266099] perf: interrupt took too long (10940 > 10840), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 18250 [57559.645404] perf: interrupt took too long (13714 > 13675), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 14500 [61608.697728] Can't find PMC that caused IRQ [71774.463111] kmemleak: 12 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak) [92372.044785] process '@/usr/bin/gnatmake-5' started with executable stack [92849.380672] FS-Cache: Loaded [92849.417269] FS-Cache: Netfs 'nfs' registered for caching [92849.595974] NFS: Registering the id_resolver key type [92849.596000] Key type id_resolver registered [92849.596000] Key type id_legacy registered [101808.079143] kmemleak: 1 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak) [106904.323471] Can't find PMC that caused IRQ [129416.391456] kmemleak: 1 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak) [158171.604221] kmemleak: 34 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak) $ sudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleakWhen they are no longer present, they are most likely false positives.
How can this be? Shouldn’t the false positive also be logged in `/sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak`?
Was this triggered during boot? Or under some workload?
From the timestamps it looks like under some load. Kind regards, Paul