Re: [PATCH 14/15] x86/numa: remove redundant iteration over memblock.reserved
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Date: 2020-07-28 11:03:18
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-iommu, linux-mips, linux-mm, linux-riscv, linux-s390, linux-sh, lkml, sparclinux
On 07/28/20 at 08:11am, Mike Rapoport wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Mike Rapoport <redacted> numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug() function first traverses numa_meminfo regions to set node ID in memblock.reserved and than traverses memblock.reserved to update reserved_nodemask to include node IDs that were set in the first loop. Remove redundant traversal over memblock.reserved and update reserved_nodemask while iterating over numa_meminfo. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <redacted> --- arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 26 ++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c index 8ee952038c80..4078abd33938 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c@@ -498,31 +498,25 @@ static void __init numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug(void) * and use those ranges to set the nid in memblock.reserved. * This will split up the memblock regions along node * boundaries and will set the node IDs as well. + * + * The nid will also be set in reserved_nodemask which is later + * used to clear MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG flag. + * + * [ Note, when booting with mem=nn[kMG] or in a kdump kernel, + * numa_meminfo might not include all memblock.reserved + * memory ranges, because quirks such as trim_snb_memory() + * reserve specific pages for Sandy Bridge graphics. + * These ranges will remain with nid == MAX_NUMNODES. ] */ for (i = 0; i < numa_meminfo.nr_blks; i++) { struct numa_memblk *mb = numa_meminfo.blk + i; int ret; ret = memblock_set_node(mb->start, mb->end - mb->start, &memblock.reserved, mb->nid); + node_set(mb->nid, reserved_nodemask);
Really? This will set all node id into reserved_nodemask. But in the current code, it's setting nid into memblock reserved region which interleaves with numa_memoinfo, then get those nid and set it in reserved_nodemask. This is so different, with my understanding. Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks Baoquan
WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
}
- /*
- * Now go over all reserved memblock regions, to construct a
- * node mask of all kernel reserved memory areas.
- *
- * [ Note, when booting with mem=nn[kMG] or in a kdump kernel,
- * numa_meminfo might not include all memblock.reserved
- * memory ranges, because quirks such as trim_snb_memory()
- * reserve specific pages for Sandy Bridge graphics. ]
- */
- for_each_memblock(reserved, mb_region) {
- int nid = memblock_get_region_node(mb_region);
-
- if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES)
- node_set(nid, reserved_nodemask);
- }
-
/*
* Finally, clear the MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG flag for all memory
* belonging to the reserved node mask.
--
2.26.2