Re: [PATCH] powerpc/64: Fix an out of date comment about MMIO ordering

On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 12:38:20 -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:

This primitive has been renamed, but because it was spelled incorrectly in the
first place it must have escaped the fixup patch.  As far as I can tell this
logic is still correct: smp_mb__after_spinlock() uses the default smp_mb()
implementation, which is "sync" rather than "hwsync" but those are the same
(though I'm not that familiar with PowerPC).

Applied to powerpc/next.

[1/1] powerpc/64: Fix an out of date comment about MMIO ordering
      https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/147c13413c04bc6a2bd76f2503402905e5e98cff

cheers