Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] powerpc/dt_cpu_ftrs: Add feature for 2nd DAWR
From: Jordan Niethe <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-17 05:45:51
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 2:10 PM Ravi Bangoria [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Add new device-tree feature for 2nd DAWR. If this feature is present, 2nd DAWR is supported, otherwise not. Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <redacted> --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h | 7 +++++-- arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h index e506d429b1af..3445c86e1f6f 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h@@ -214,6 +214,7 @@ static inline void cpu_feature_keys_init(void) { } #define CPU_FTR_P9_TLBIE_ERAT_BUG LONG_ASM_CONST(0x0001000000000000) #define CPU_FTR_P9_RADIX_PREFETCH_BUG LONG_ASM_CONST(0x0002000000000000) #define CPU_FTR_ARCH_31 LONG_ASM_CONST(0x0004000000000000) +#define CPU_FTR_DAWR1 LONG_ASM_CONST(0x0008000000000000) #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__@@ -497,14 +498,16 @@ static inline void cpu_feature_keys_init(void) { } #define CPU_FTRS_POSSIBLE \ (CPU_FTRS_POWER7 | CPU_FTRS_POWER8E | CPU_FTRS_POWER8 | \ CPU_FTR_ALTIVEC_COMP | CPU_FTR_VSX_COMP | CPU_FTRS_POWER9 | \ - CPU_FTRS_POWER9_DD2_1 | CPU_FTRS_POWER9_DD2_2 | CPU_FTRS_POWER10) + CPU_FTRS_POWER9_DD2_1 | CPU_FTRS_POWER9_DD2_2 | CPU_FTRS_POWER10 | \ + CPU_FTR_DAWR1) #else #define CPU_FTRS_POSSIBLE \ (CPU_FTRS_PPC970 | CPU_FTRS_POWER5 | \ CPU_FTRS_POWER6 | CPU_FTRS_POWER7 | CPU_FTRS_POWER8E | \ CPU_FTRS_POWER8 | CPU_FTRS_CELL | CPU_FTRS_PA6T | \ CPU_FTR_VSX_COMP | CPU_FTR_ALTIVEC_COMP | CPU_FTRS_POWER9 | \ - CPU_FTRS_POWER9_DD2_1 | CPU_FTRS_POWER9_DD2_2 | CPU_FTRS_POWER10) + CPU_FTRS_POWER9_DD2_1 | CPU_FTRS_POWER9_DD2_2 | CPU_FTRS_POWER10 | \ + CPU_FTR_DAWR1)
Instead of putting CPU_FTR_DAWR1 into CPU_FTRS_POSSIBLE should it go into CPU_FTRS_POWER10? Then it will be picked up by CPU_FTRS_POSSIBLE.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN */ #endif #elsediff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c index ac650c233cd9..c78cd3596ec4 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c@@ -574,6 +574,12 @@ static int __init feat_enable_mma(struct dt_cpu_feature *f) return 1; } +static int __init feat_enable_debug_facilities_v31(struct dt_cpu_feature *f) +{ + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= CPU_FTR_DAWR1; + return 1; +} + struct dt_cpu_feature_match { const char *name; int (*enable)(struct dt_cpu_feature *f);@@ -649,6 +655,7 @@ static struct dt_cpu_feature_match __initdata {"wait-v3", feat_enable, 0}, {"prefix-instructions", feat_enable, 0}, {"matrix-multiply-assist", feat_enable_mma, 0}, + {"debug-facilities-v31", feat_enable_debug_facilities_v31, 0},
Since all feat_enable_debug_facilities_v31() does is set
CPU_FTR_DAWR1, if you just have:
{"debug-facilities-v31", feat_enable, CPU_FTR_DAWR1},
I think cpufeatures_process_feature() should set it in for you at this point:
if (m->enable(f)) {
cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= m->cpu_ftr_bit_mask;
break;
}
}; static bool __initdata using_dt_cpu_ftrs; -- 2.26.2