Re: [PATCH 01/11] kexec_file: allow archs to handle special regions while locating memory hole
From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2020-06-29 18:48:47
Also in:
kexec, lkml
From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2020-06-29 18:48:47
Also in:
kexec, lkml
On 28/06/20 7:58 am, piliu wrote:
Hi Hari, If in [4/11], get_exclude_memory_ranges() turns out to be unnecessary ,then this patch is abundant either. As my understanding, memblock has already helped to achieved the purpose that get_exclude_memory_ranges() wants.
As mentioned in the other patch, there is a need for @exclude_ranges as crashkernel region is likely to have an overlap with regions like opal, rtas.. But yeah.. the weak function should have been kexec_locate_mem_hole() instead of kexec_add_buffer(). Will take care of that in v2.
On 06/27/2020 03:04 AM, Hari Bathini wrote:quoted
Some archs can have special memory regions, within the given memory range, which can't be used for the buffer in a kexec segment. As kexec_add_buffer() function is being called from generic code as well, add weak arch_kexec_add_buffer definition for archs to override & take care of special regions before trying to locate a memory hole. Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks Hari