Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 3 authors, 2020-06-15

Re: properly support exec and wait with kernel pointers

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2020-06-15 13:43:21
Also in: linux-arch, linux-arm-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-mips, linux-s390, lkml, sparclinux

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:00 PM Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi all,

this series first cleans up the exec code and then adds proper
kernel_execveat and kernel_wait callers instead of relying on the fact
that the early init code and kernel threads implicitly run with
the address limit set to KERNEL_DS.

Note that the cleanup removes the compat execve(at) handlers (almost)
entirely, as we can handle the compat difference very nicely in a
unified codebase.  The only exception is x86 where this would list the
handlers twice in the same syscall table due to the messed up x32
design.  I had to add an extra compat handler just for that case, but
maybe someone has a better idea.
I looked at all the patches and I like it a lot. I replied with some suggestions
for x32, but maybe I misunderstood what its problem is, as I don't see
anything preventing us from having two entries in the x32 table pointing
to the same function.

       Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help