Thread (4 messages) flat view 4 messages, 3 authors, 2020-06-09

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] powerpc/crash: Use NMI context for printk when starting to crash

From: Leonardo Bras <hidden>
Date: 2020-05-13 05:17:14
Also in: lkml

Hello Nick, thanks for your feedback.
Comments inline:

On Wed, 2020-05-13 at 14:36 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
Excerpts from Leonardo Bras's message of May 13, 2020 7:45 am:
quoted
Currently, if printk lock (logbuf_lock) is held by other thread during
crash, there is a chance of deadlocking the crash on next printk, and
blocking a possibly desired kdump.

At the start of default_machine_crash_shutdown, make printk enter
NMI context, as it will use per-cpu buffers to store the message,
and avoid locking logbuf_lock.
printk_nmi_enter is used in one other place outside nmi_enter.

Is there a different/better way to handle this? What do other 
architectures do?
To be honest, I was unaware of nmi_enter() and I have yet to study what
other architectures do here.
Other subsystems get put into an nmi-mode when we call nmi_enter
(lockdep, ftrace, rcu etc). It seems like those would be useful for 
similar reasons, so at least explaining why that is not used in a 
comment would be good.
My reasoning for using printk_nmi_enter() here was only to keep it from
using printk regular buffer (and locking logbuf_lock) at this point of
the crash.

I have yet to see how nmi_enter() extra functions would happen to
interfere with the crash at this point. 

(In a quick look at x86, (native_machine_crash_shutdown) I could not
see it using any printk, so it may not be necessary).
Aside from that, I welcome any effort to make our crashes more reliable
so thanks for working on this stuff.

Thanks,
Nick
Thank you, it means a lot.

Leonardo Bras
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help