Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] powerpc/crash: Use NMI context for printk when starting to crash
From: Leonardo Bras <hidden>
Date: 2020-05-13 05:17:14
Also in:
lkml
Hello Nick, thanks for your feedback. Comments inline: On Wed, 2020-05-13 at 14:36 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
Excerpts from Leonardo Bras's message of May 13, 2020 7:45 am:quoted
Currently, if printk lock (logbuf_lock) is held by other thread during crash, there is a chance of deadlocking the crash on next printk, and blocking a possibly desired kdump. At the start of default_machine_crash_shutdown, make printk enter NMI context, as it will use per-cpu buffers to store the message, and avoid locking logbuf_lock.printk_nmi_enter is used in one other place outside nmi_enter. Is there a different/better way to handle this? What do other architectures do?
To be honest, I was unaware of nmi_enter() and I have yet to study what other architectures do here.
Other subsystems get put into an nmi-mode when we call nmi_enter (lockdep, ftrace, rcu etc). It seems like those would be useful for similar reasons, so at least explaining why that is not used in a comment would be good.
My reasoning for using printk_nmi_enter() here was only to keep it from using printk regular buffer (and locking logbuf_lock) at this point of the crash. I have yet to see how nmi_enter() extra functions would happen to interfere with the crash at this point. (In a quick look at x86, (native_machine_crash_shutdown) I could not see it using any printk, so it may not be necessary).
Aside from that, I welcome any effort to make our crashes more reliable so thanks for working on this stuff. Thanks, Nick
Thank you, it means a lot. Leonardo Bras