Hi
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 5:53 PM Mark Brown [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 04:41:23PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
quoted
Use dev_dbg instead of dev_err in irq handler, the dev_err
is expensive, we don't need the message to be printed everytime,
which is almost a debug option.
quoted
if (esr & ESAI_ESR_RFF_MASK)
- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "isr: Receiving overrun\n");
+ dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "isr: Receiving overrun\n");
if (esr & ESAI_ESR_TFE_MASK)
- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "isr: Transmission underrun\n");
+ dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "isr: Transmission underrun\n");
These are error messages which would suggest a problem that'd lead to
data corruption, it seems bad not to try to flag that to the user -
surely we've got bigger problems than performance if this happens?
Perhaps convert to a ratelimited print if the issue is that when errors
happen they happen a lot?
Thanks for review, I will rethink about this.
best regards
wang shengjiu