Re: usb: gadget: fsl: Fix a wrong judgment in fsl_udc_probe()
From: Markus Elfring <hidden>
Date: 2020-04-10 08:30:31
Also in:
kernel-janitors, linux-usb, lkml
From: Markus Elfring <hidden>
Date: 2020-04-10 08:30:31
Also in:
kernel-janitors, linux-usb, lkml
Hardware experiments show that the negative return value is not just "-EPROBE_DEFER".
How much will this specific error code influence our understanding of the discussed software situation?
quoted
quoted
+ ret = udc_controller->irq ? : -ENODEV;Will it be clearer to specify values for all cases in such a conditional operator (instead of leaving one case empty)?I don't know what you mean of "instead of leaving one case empty".
I suggest to reconsider also the proposed specification “… ? : …”. Regards, Markus