Thread (8 messages) flat view 8 messages, 3 authors, 2020-03-10

Re: [PATCH V15] mm/debug: Add tests validating architecture page table helpers

From: Anshuman Khandual <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-07 00:56:52
Also in: linux-arch, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, linux-riscv, linux-s390, lkml


On 03/07/2020 06:04 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
quoted
On Mar 6, 2020, at 7:03 PM, Anshuman Khandual [off-list ref] wrote:

Hmm, set_pte_at() function is not preferred here for these tests. The idea
is to avoid or atleast minimize TLB/cache flushes triggered from these sort
of 'static' tests. set_pte_at() is platform provided and could/might trigger
these flushes or some other platform specific synchronization stuff. Just
Why is that important for this debugging option?
Primarily reason is to avoid TLB/cache flush instructions on the system
during these tests that only involve transforming different page table
level entries through helpers. Unless really necessary, why should it
emit any TLB/cache flush instructions ?
quoted
wondering is there specific reason with respect to the soft lock up problem
making it necessary to use set_pte_at() rather than a simple WRITE_ONCE() ?
Looks at the s390 version of set_pte_at(), it has this comment,
vmaddr);

/*
 * Certain architectures need to do special things when PTEs
 * within a page table are directly modified.  Thus, the following
 * hook is made available.
 */

I can only guess that powerpc  could be the same here.
This comment is present in multiple platforms while defining set_pte_at().
Is not 'barrier()' here alone good enough ? Else what exactly set_pte_at()
does as compared to WRITE_ONCE() that avoids the soft lock up, just trying
to understand.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help