On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 07:35:19PM +1100, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
This check for a missing PHB has existing in various forms since the
initial PPC64 port was upstreamed in 2002. The idea seems to be that we
need to guard against creating pci-specific data structures for the non-pci
children of a PCI device tree node (e.g. USB devices). However, we only
create pci_dn structures for DT nodes that correspond to PCI devices so
there's not much point in doing this check in the eeh_probe path.
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
I always wondered how to test that block... and it's just dead code.
Reviewed-by: Sam Bobroff <redacted>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
index 9cb3370..a9e4ca7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
@@ -1120,7 +1120,6 @@ core_initcall_sync(eeh_init);
*/
void eeh_add_device_early(struct pci_dn *pdn)
{
- struct pci_controller *phb = pdn ? pdn->phb : NULL;
struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
if (!edev)@@ -1129,11 +1128,6 @@ void eeh_add_device_early(struct pci_dn *pdn)
if (!eeh_has_flag(EEH_PROBE_MODE_DEVTREE))
return;
- /* USB Bus children of PCI devices will not have BUID's */
- if (NULL == phb ||
- (eeh_has_flag(EEH_PROBE_MODE_DEVTREE) && 0 == phb->buid))
- return;
-
eeh_ops->probe(pdn, NULL);
}
--
2.9.5