Thread (9 messages) flat view 9 messages, 6 authors, 2020-03-02

Re: [PATCH] ima: add a new CONFIG for loading arch-specific policies

From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2020-02-27 19:38:22
Also in: linux-efi, linux-integrity, linux-s390, lkml

On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 15:36 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 11:21 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
quoted
Hi Nayna,
quoted
+
+config IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT
+	bool
+	depends on IMA
+	depends on IMA_ARCH_POLICY
+	default n
+	help
+	   This option is selected by architectures to enable secure and/or
+	   trusted boot based on IMA runtime policies.
Why is the default for this new config "n"?
Is there any reason to not turn on this config if both IMA and 
IMA_ARCH_POLICY are set to y?
Good catch.  Having "IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT" depend on
"IMA_ARCH_POLICY" doesn't make sense.  "IMA_ARCH_POLICY" needs to be
selected.
After discussing this some more with Nayna, the new Kconfig indicates
that the architecture defines the arch_ima_get_secureboot() and
arch_get_ima_policy() functions, but doesn't automatically enable
IMA_ARCH_POLICY.  The decision to enable IMA_ARCH_POLICY is left up to
whoever is building the kernel.  The patch, at least this aspect of
it, is correct.

Mimi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help