Re: [PATCH] powerpc/kprobes: Fix trap address when trap happened in real mode
From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2020-02-18 13:58:05
Also in:
lkml
Le 18/02/2020 à 13:33, Masami Hiramatsu a écrit :
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:04:41 +0100 Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
Nevertheless, if one symbol has been forgotten in the blacklist, I think it is a problem if it generate Oopses.There is a long history also on x86 to make a blacklist. Anyway, how did you get this error on PPC32? Somewhere would you like to probe and it is a real mode function? Or, it happened unexpectedly?The first Oops I got was triggered by a WARN_ON() kind of trap in real mode. The trap exception handler called kprobe_handler() which tried to read the instruction at the trap address (which was a real-mode address) so it triggered a Bad Access Fault. This was initially the purpose of my patch.OK, then filtering the trap reason in kprobe handler is a bit strange. It should be done in the previous stage (maybe in trap.c)
See commit https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?h=v5.6-rc2&id=6cc89bad60a673a24386f1ada83de8a068a78909
Can we filter it by exception flag or only by checking the instruction which causes the exception, or needs get_kprobe()...?
The trap instruction used by kprobe is also used for other purposes like BUG_ON() or WARN_ON(), so needs get_kprobe()
quoted
After discussion with you, I started looking at what would be the effect of setting a kprobe event in a function which runs in real mode.If the kprobe single-stepping (or emulation) works in real mode, just ignore the kprobes pre/post_handlers and increment nmissed count. If that doesn't work, we have to call a BUG_ON, because we can not continue the code execution. And also, you have to find a way to make a blacklist for real mode code.
Yes, it has to be done function by function (hoppefully there's not more than a dozen). But I'd like something which can fails gracefully for the functions we will forget to mark noprobe. But as a first step I'd really like a bug fix in 5.6 to avoid Oopsing in kprobe_handler() at a non-kprobe trap. Christophe