Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] powerpc: Book3S 64-bit "heavyweight" KASAN support
From: Daniel Axtens <hidden>
Date: 2019-12-17 13:30:46
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
Hi Christophe, I'm working through your feedback, thank you. Regarding this one:
quoted
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c@@ -2081,7 +2081,14 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *stack) /* * See if this is an exception frame. * We look for the "regshere" marker in the current frame. + * + * KASAN may complain about this. If it is an exception frame, + * we won't have unpoisoned the stack in asm when we set the + * exception marker. If it's not an exception frame, who knows + * how things are laid out - the shadow could be in any state + * at all. Just disable KASAN reporting for now. */ + kasan_disable_current(); if (validate_sp(sp, tsk, STACK_INT_FRAME_SIZE) && stack[STACK_FRAME_MARKER] == STACK_FRAME_REGS_MARKER) { struct pt_regs *regs = (struct pt_regs *)@@ -2091,6 +2098,7 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *stack) regs->trap, (void *)regs->nip, (void *)lr); firstframe = 1; } + kasan_enable_current();If this is really a concern for all targets including PPC32, should it be a separate patch with a Fixes: tag to be applied back in stable as well ?
I've managed to repro this by commening out the kasan_disable/enable lines, and just booting in qemu without a disk attached: sudo qemu-system-ppc64 -accel kvm -m 2G -M pseries -cpu power9 -kernel ./vmlinux -nographic -chardev stdio,id=charserial0,mux=on -device spapr-vty,chardev=charserial0,reg=0x30000000 -mon chardev=charserial0,mode=readline -nodefaults -smp 2 ... [ 0.210740] Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0) [ 0.210789] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.5.0-rc1-next-20191213-16824-g469a24fbdb34 #12 [ 0.210844] Call Trace: [ 0.210866] [c00000006a4839b0] [c000000001f74f48] dump_stack+0xfc/0x154 (unreliable) [ 0.210915] [c00000006a483a00] [c00000000025411c] panic+0x258/0x59c [ 0.210958] [c00000006a483aa0] [c0000000024870b0] mount_block_root+0x648/0x7ac [ 0.211005] ================================================================== [ 0.211054] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in show_stack+0x438/0x580 [ 0.211095] Read of size 8 at addr c00000006a483b00 by task swapper/0/1 [ 0.211134] [ 0.211152] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.5.0-rc1-next-20191213-16824-g469a24fbdb34 #12 [ 0.211207] Call Trace: [ 0.211225] [c00000006a483680] [c000000001f74f48] dump_stack+0xfc/0x154 (unreliable) [ 0.211274] [c00000006a4836d0] [c0000000008f877c] print_address_description.isra.10+0x7c/0x470 [ 0.211330] [c00000006a483760] [c0000000008f8e7c] __kasan_report+0x1bc/0x244 [ 0.211380] [c00000006a483830] [c0000000008f6eb8] kasan_report+0x18/0x30 [ 0.211422] [c00000006a483850] [c0000000008fa5d4] __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x24/0x40 [ 0.211471] [c00000006a483870] [c00000000003d448] show_stack+0x438/0x580 [ 0.211512] [c00000006a4839b0] [c000000001f74f48] dump_stack+0xfc/0x154 [ 0.211553] [c00000006a483a00] [c00000000025411c] panic+0x258/0x59c [ 0.211595] [c00000006a483aa0] [c0000000024870b0] mount_block_root+0x648/0x7ac [ 0.211644] [c00000006a483be0] [c000000002487784] prepare_namespace+0x1ec/0x240 [ 0.211694] [c00000006a483c60] [c00000000248669c] kernel_init_freeable+0x7f4/0x870 [ 0.211745] [c00000006a483da0] [c000000000011f30] kernel_init+0x3c/0x15c [ 0.211787] [c00000006a483e20] [c00000000000bebc] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x80 [ 0.211834] [ 0.211851] Allocated by task 0: [ 0.211878] save_stack+0x2c/0xe0 [ 0.211904] __kasan_kmalloc.isra.16+0x11c/0x150 [ 0.211937] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x114/0x3b0 [ 0.211971] copy_process+0x5b8/0x6410 [ 0.211996] _do_fork+0x130/0xbf0 [ 0.212022] kernel_thread+0xdc/0x130 [ 0.212047] rest_init+0x44/0x184 [ 0.212072] start_kernel+0x77c/0x7dc [ 0.212098] start_here_common+0x1c/0x20 [ 0.212122] [ 0.212139] Freed by task 0: [ 0.212163] (stack is not available) [ 0.212187] [ 0.212205] The buggy address belongs to the object at c00000006a480000 [ 0.212205] which belongs to the cache thread_stack of size 16384 [ 0.212285] The buggy address is located 15104 bytes inside of [ 0.212285] 16384-byte region [c00000006a480000, c00000006a484000) [ 0.212356] The buggy address belongs to the page: [ 0.212391] page:c00c0000001a9200 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:c00000006a019e00 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0 [ 0.212455] raw: 007ffff000010200 5deadbeef0000100 5deadbeef0000122 c00000006a019e00 [ 0.212504] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000100010 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 [ 0.212551] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected [ 0.212583] [ 0.212600] addr c00000006a483b00 is located in stack of task swapper/0/1 at offset 0 in frame: [ 0.212656] mount_block_root+0x0/0x7ac [ 0.212681] [ 0.212698] this frame has 1 object: [ 0.212722] [32, 64) 'b' [ 0.212723] [ 0.212755] Memory state around the buggy address: [ 0.212788] c00000006a483a00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 0.212836] c00000006a483a80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 0.212884] >c00000006a483b00: f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 00 f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 [ 0.212931] ^ [ 0.212957] c00000006a483b80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 0.213005] c00000006a483c00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 0.213052] ================================================================== [ 0.213100] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint [ 0.213134] [c00000006a483be0] [c000000002487784] prepare_namespace+0x1ec/0x240 [ 0.213182] [c00000006a483c60] [c00000000248669c] kernel_init_freeable+0x7f4/0x870 [ 0.213231] [c00000006a483da0] [c000000000011f30] kernel_init+0x3c/0x15c [ 0.213272] [c00000006a483e20] [c00000000000bebc] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x80 Is that something that reproduces on ppc32? I don't see it running the test_kasan tests, so I guess that matches up with your experience. Regards, Daniel
quoted
sp = newsp; } while (count++ < kstack_depth_to_print);diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c index 6620f37abe73..d994c7c39c8d 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ unsigned long tce_alloc_start, tce_alloc_end; u64 ppc64_rma_size; #endif static phys_addr_t first_memblock_size; +static phys_addr_t top_phys_addr; static int __initdata boot_cpu_count; static int __init early_parse_mem(char *p)@@ -449,6 +450,26 @@ static bool validate_mem_limit(u64 base, u64 *size) { u64 max_mem = 1UL << (MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS); + /* + * To handle the NUMA/discontiguous memory case, don't allow a block + * to be added if it falls completely beyond the configured physical + * memory. Print an informational message. + * + * Frustratingly we also see this with qemu - it seems to split the + * specified memory into a number of smaller blocks. If this happens + * under qemu, it probably represents misconfiguration. So we want + * the message to be noticeable, but not shouty. + * + * See Documentation/powerpc/kasan.txt + */ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN) && + (base >= ((u64)CONFIG_PHYS_MEM_SIZE_FOR_KASAN << 20))) { + pr_warn("KASAN: not adding memory block at %llx (size %llx)\n" + "This could be due to discontiguous memory or kernel misconfiguration.", + base, *size); + return false; + } + if (base >= max_mem) return false; if ((base + *size) > max_mem)@@ -572,8 +593,11 @@ void __init early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size) /* Add the chunk to the MEMBLOCK list */ if (add_mem_to_memblock) { - if (validate_mem_limit(base, &size)) + if (validate_mem_limit(base, &size)) { memblock_add(base, size); + if (base + size > top_phys_addr) + top_phys_addr = base + size; + }Can we use max() here ? Something like top_phys_addr = max(base + size, top_phys_addr);quoted
} }@@ -613,6 +637,8 @@ static void __init early_reserve_mem_dt(void) static void __init early_reserve_mem(void) { __be64 *reserve_map; + phys_addr_t kasan_shadow_start; + phys_addr_t kasan_memory_size; reserve_map = (__be64 *)(((unsigned long)initial_boot_params) + fdt_off_mem_rsvmap(initial_boot_params));@@ -651,6 +677,42 @@ static void __init early_reserve_mem(void) return; } #endif + + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64)) { + kasan_memory_size = + ((phys_addr_t)CONFIG_PHYS_MEM_SIZE_FOR_KASAN << 20); + + if (top_phys_addr < kasan_memory_size) { + /* + * We are doomed. We shouldn't even be able to get this + * far, but we do in qemu. If we continue and turn + * relocations on, we'll take fatal page faults for + * memory that's not physically present. Instead, + * panic() here: it will be saved to __log_buf even if + * it doesn't get printed to the console. + */ + panic("Tried to book a KASAN kernel configured for %u MB with only %llu MB! Aborting.",book ==> boot ?quoted
+ CONFIG_PHYS_MEM_SIZE_FOR_KASAN, + (u64)(top_phys_addr >> 20)); + } else if (top_phys_addr > kasan_memory_size) { + /* print a biiiig warning in hopes people notice */ + pr_err("===========================================\n" + "Physical memory exceeds compiled-in maximum!\n" + "This kernel was compiled for KASAN with %u MB physical memory.\n" + "The physical memory detected is at least %llu MB.\n" + "Memory above the compiled limit will not be used!\n" + "===========================================\n", + CONFIG_PHYS_MEM_SIZE_FOR_KASAN, + (u64)(top_phys_addr >> 20)); + } + + kasan_shadow_start = _ALIGN_DOWN(kasan_memory_size * 7 / 8, + PAGE_SIZE);Can't this fit on a single line ? powerpc allows 90 chars.quoted
+ DBG("reserving %llx -> %llx for KASAN", + kasan_shadow_start, top_phys_addr); + memblock_reserve(kasan_shadow_start, + top_phys_addr - kasan_shadow_start);Same ?quoted
+ } } #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEMdiff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/Makefile index 6577897673dd..f02b15c78e4d 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/Makefile +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/Makefile@@ -2,4 +2,5 @@ KASAN_SANITIZE := n -obj-$(CONFIG_PPC32) += kasan_init_32.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PPC32) += init_32.oShouldn't we do ppc32 name change in another patch ?quoted
+obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64) += init_book3s_64.odiff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/kasan_init_32.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_32.c similarity index 100% rename from arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/kasan_init_32.c rename to arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_32.c diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_book3s_64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_book3s_64.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..f961e96be136 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_book3s_64.c@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * KASAN for 64-bit Book3S powerpc + * + * Copyright (C) 2019 IBM Corporation + * Author: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> + */ + +#define DISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING + +#include <linux/kasan.h> +#include <linux/printk.h> +#include <linux/sched/task.h> +#include <asm/pgalloc.h> + +void __init kasan_init(void) +{ + int i; + void *k_start = kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)RADIX_KERN_VIRT_START); + void *k_end = kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)RADIX_VMEMMAP_END); + + pte_t pte = __pte(__pa(kasan_early_shadow_page) | + pgprot_val(PAGE_KERNEL) | _PAGE_PTE);Can't we do something with existing helpers ? Something like: pte = pte_mkpte(pfn_pte(virt_to_pfn(kasan_early_shadow_page), PAGE_KERNEL));quoted
+ + if (!early_radix_enabled()) + panic("KASAN requires radix!"); + + for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; i++) + __set_pte_at(&init_mm, (unsigned long)kasan_early_shadow_page, + &kasan_early_shadow_pte[i], pte, 0); + + for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PMD; i++) + pmd_populate_kernel(&init_mm, &kasan_early_shadow_pmd[i], + kasan_early_shadow_pte); + + for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PUD; i++) + pud_populate(&init_mm, &kasan_early_shadow_pud[i], + kasan_early_shadow_pmd); + + memset(kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)PAGE_OFFSET), KASAN_SHADOW_INIT, + KASAN_SHADOW_SIZE); + + kasan_populate_early_shadow( + kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)RADIX_KERN_VIRT_START), + kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)RADIX_VMALLOC_START)); + + /* leave a hole here for vmalloc */ + + kasan_populate_early_shadow( + kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)RADIX_VMALLOC_END), + kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)RADIX_VMEMMAP_END)); + + flush_tlb_kernel_range((unsigned long)k_start, (unsigned long)k_end); + + /* mark early shadow region as RO and wipe */ + pte = __pte(__pa(kasan_early_shadow_page) | + pgprot_val(PAGE_KERNEL_RO) | _PAGE_PTE);Same comment as above, use helpers ?quoted
+ for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; i++) + __set_pte_at(&init_mm, (unsigned long)kasan_early_shadow_page, + &kasan_early_shadow_pte[i], pte, 0); + + /* + * clear_page relies on some cache info that hasn't been set up yet. + * It ends up looping ~forever and blows up other data. + * Use memset instead. + */ + memset(kasan_early_shadow_page, 0, PAGE_SIZE); + + /* Enable error messages */ + init_task.kasan_depth = 0; + pr_info("KASAN init done (64-bit Book3S heavyweight mode)\n"); +}Christophe