On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 5:25 PM Christophe Leroy
[off-list ref] wrote:
Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] a écrit :
quoted
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:43 PM Ben Hutchings
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 2019-11-08 at 22:07 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted
@@ -192,7 +190,7 @@ V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_time)
bl __get_datapage@local
mr r9, r3 /* datapage ptr in r9 */
- lwz r3,STAMP_XTIME+TSPEC_TV_SEC(r9)
+ lwz r3,STAMP_XTIME_SEC+LOWPART(r9)
"LOWPART" should be "LOPART".
Thanks, fixed both instances in a patch on top now. I considered folding
it into the original patch, but as it's close to the merge window I'd
rather not rebase it, and this way I also give you credit for
finding the bug.
Take care, might conflict with
https://github.com/linuxppc/linux/commit/5e381d727fe8834ca5a126f510194a7a4ac6dd3a
Sorry for my late reply. I see this commit and no other variant of it has
made it into linux-next by now, so I assume this is not getting sent for v5.5
and it's not stopping me from sending my own pull request.
Please let me know if I missed something and this will cause problems.
On a related note: are you still working on the generic lib/vdso support for
powerpc? Without that, future libc implementations that use 64-bit time_t
will have to use the slow clock_gettime64 syscall instead of the vdso,
which has a significant performance impact.
Arnd