Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 5 authors, 2019-11-26

Re: [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: treat dev->bus_dma_mask as a DMA limit

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2019-11-21 16:02:24
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-ide, linux-iommu, linux-mips, linux-pci, lkml

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:55:39PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
Hmm, there's no functional dependency though, is there? AFAICS it's 
essentially just a context conflict. Is it worth simply dropping (or 
postponing) the local renaming in __dma_direct_optimal_gfp_mask(), or 
perhaps even cross-merging arm64/for-next/zone-dma into dma/for-next?
I would have no problem with pulling it in.  I'd kinda hate creating
the conflict, though.  So if the arm64 maintainers are fine with it
I'll pull it in, especially if I get an ACK from Robin.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help