Re: [PATCH RFC 1/5] dma/direct: turn ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS into a variable

[PATCH RFC 0/5] ARM: Raspberry Pi 4 DMA support · Nicolas Saenz Julienne <hidden> · 2019-10-14
[PATCH RFC 1/5] dma/direct: turn ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS into a variable · Nicolas Saenz Julienne <hidden> · 2019-10-14
Re: [PATCH RFC 1/5] dma/direct: turn ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS into a variable · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2019-10-30
Re: [PATCH RFC 1/5] dma/direct: turn ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS into a variable · Nicolas Saenz Julienne <hidden> · 2019-10-31
Re: [PATCH RFC 1/5] dma/direct: turn ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS into a variable · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2019-10-31
Re: [PATCH RFC 1/5] dma/direct: turn ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS into a variable · Nicolas Saenz Julienne <hidden> · 2019-10-31
Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] ARM: Raspberry Pi 4 DMA support · Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> · 2019-10-14
Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] ARM: Raspberry Pi 4 DMA support · Nicolas Saenz Julienne <hidden> · 2019-10-15
Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] ARM: Raspberry Pi 4 DMA support · Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> · 2019-10-15

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2019-10-30 22:09:26
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-iommu, linux-s390, lkml

On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 08:31:03PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:

Some architectures, notably ARM, are interested in tweaking this
depending on their runtime DMA addressing limitations.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <redacted>

Do you want me to pick this up for the 5.5 dma-mapping tree, or do you
want me to wait for the rest to settle?

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help